All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
I really appreciate your prompt revision and responses to the reviewers' suggestions. I think the paper is ready to move forward, and I'm happy to accept it for publication.
Both reviewers find the manuscript acceptable and have only minor corrections. Please address the reviewers points, either through revision or in your rebuttal. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript so we can move ahead with publication.
Both reviewers find the manuscript acceptable and have only minor corrections. Please address the reviewers points, either through revision or in your rebuttal. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript so we can move ahead with publication.
mention if the plants of Jatropha are toxic or non toxic,
It would be appropriate to change the title and that is more specific, as are different agro-climatic conditions throughout southeastern Mexico of "Reproductive biology of the plant Jatropha curcas biofuel in Its center of origin" to "Reproductive biology of the plant Jatropha curcas biofuel from Soconusco, Chiapas. "describe in detail the climatic conditions of the Soconusco
Recommend that the study had been conducted in a plantation of a hectare, as live fences show the differences with a real plantation,
a soil analysis is recommended to determine the content of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium correlate the results with flowering and weather conditions (temperature and average rainfall)
increase the number of plants evaluated because only were ten plants
1. mention if the plants of Jatropha are toxic or non toxic,
2. It would be appropriate to change the title and that is more specific, as are different agro-climatic conditions throughout southeastern Mexico of "Reproductive biology of the plant Jatropha curcas biofuel in Its center of origin" to "Reproductive biology of the plant Jatropha curcas biofuel from Soconusco, Chiapas. "
3. describe in detail the climatic conditions of the Soconusco,
4. increase the number of plants evaluated because only were ten plants
5. behavior is different than a plantation plants as a hedge, as well the proximity of plants live fence is one meter between plants
I found this paper to be relatively straight forward and to the point. Being removed from botany for as long as I have did amount to constant breaks in the reading to refresh myself with certain terminologies and forgotten concepts. Once made comfortable I had no issue with the work. Aside from some minor grammatical suggestions I found it needed little editing.
No comments.
No comments.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.