Effects of nitrogen doses on stomatal characteristics, chlorophyll content, and agronomic traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

View article
Plant Biology

Introduction

Cereals and products obtained from seeds are an indispensable source of basic nutrition for the majority in Turkey, as in many countries of the world. Cereals are the most important nutritional sources in human nutrition. More than 50% of the calorie input in nutrition is covered by seeds. Wheat is an extremely useful plant in terms of meeting people’s calorie and protein needs. At 20% of the world’s calorie and protein consumptions is met by the wheat plant. Wheat (Triticum L.) is one of the first cultivated cereal and has been the main food of people in Europe, Western Asia and North Africa for thousands of years. In Turkey, wheat ranks first in terms of both cultivation area and production potential. According to 2020 data, wheat constituted 28% of the seed cultivation area and 65% of seed production while wheat is cultivated in 44% of the total cultivated area in Turkey (FAOSTAT, 2020).

The seed demand increases by the population. Both increasing yields for the rising demand for seed production and ensuring sustainability are the biggest challenges in agriculture. Fertilization is required for high efficiency in agricultural systems.

Nitrogen (N) is the most important macronutrient limiting plant growth (Hawkesford, 2014; Yang et al., 2019). N greatly boosts crops (Lachutta & Jankowski, 2024). N fertilization delays leaf aging by reducing N release from the leaf after flowering and provides carbohydrates for seed filling (Li et al., 2012). Plant growth and photosynthesis are inhibited in N deficiency, which causes a decrease in yield (Jin JiYun & He Ping, 1999; Shangguan, Shao & Dyckmans, 2000). Also, vegetative and reproduction are delayed, and yield components such as yield and agronomic traits, the number of spikes per plant, number of seeds per spike, single seed weight and number of seeds per plant decrease (Wang et al., 2021). Additionally, N deficiency reduces leaf area index and protein content of the plant and seed (Steer & Harrigan, 1986). N deficiency increases flower abscission, reduces seed formation and inhibits seed growth (Dordas & Sioulas, 2008; Ciampitti & Vyn, 2011). N accumulation and productivity increase are closely related to each other (Lemaire et al., 2021). The fact that N uptake by plants affects the increase in productivity shows (Kayan et al., 2020) that N physiologically plays a role in the formation of new plants (Sinclair, Rufty & Lewis, 2019).

Crop production occurs through photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation depending on leaf area index (Lee & Tollenaar, 2007; Sadras et al., 2016; Thomas & Ougham, 2014). Photosynthetic products constitute the main source of plant biomass. Therefore, as photosynthesis in the leaf increases, so does the biomass obtained (Noor et al., 2023). N affects leaf area index development (Steer & Harrigan, 1986). Seed N concentration and seed yield are the main targets in wheat breeding, but it has been difficult to increase them simultaneously due to the negative genetic relationship between them (Mu et al., 2018). When N is applied at optimum levels in wheat, 35–42% of the N accumulated in the soil is in the leaf lamina, 14–20% in the leaf sheath, 20–31% in the stem and 16–23% in the spike (Slafer, Andrade & Satorre, 1990; Bogard et al., 2010; Pask et al., 2012).

Stomata are natural microscopic pores found in the leaf that serve to connect near part of the leaf to the external environment (Barraclough et al., 2010; Gaju et al., 2014). Stomata are surrounded by a pair of protective cells and enable gas exchange between the inner part of the leaf and the ex-ternal environment. The photosynthetic capacity of plants depends on stomatal size and density. The stomatal density of the leaf, that is, the number of stomata per unit area of the leaf, is an important parameter affecting gas exchange and is important in terms of the water and carbon relations of the plant (Hedrich & Shabala, 2018; Lawson & Vialetchabrand, 2019). Stomatal movement is closely related to N. Nitrate is the main source in plant development, is important in regulating stomatal movements (Rogiers, Hardie & Smith, 2011). It has been reported by many researchers that high N fertilisation increases photosynthesis and plant growth (Evans, 1989; Doheny-Adams et al., 2012; Mu & Chen, 2021). At 75% of the N in the leaf is found in chloroplasts and is a part of ribulose bisphosphfate carboxylase (Rubisco). Reduced photosynthesis in the presence of low N is generally due to a decrease in chlorophyll content and Rubisco activity (Huber, Sugiyama & Alberte, 1989; Cechin & De Fátima Fumis, 2004). Since N is a component of chlorophyll (Robinson & Burkey, 1997), in some species wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), stomatal conductance increases with N (Evans & Terashima, 1987).

This study is based on the hypothesis that increasing N doses in wheat influences stomatal structure and chlorophyll content.

Materials and Methods

Experimental design and materials

The field study was conducted at the experimental farm of Ordu University, Faculty of Agriculture, Turkey (40°58′09″ N 37°56′19″ E) in two wheat growing seasons (2020–2021 and 2021–2022). The experiment was carried out according to the factorial randomized complete block design with 3 repetitions and for 2 years. The soil was neutral in response to (pH 5.78–6.62), somewhat salty (0.034–0.046%), with very low N (0.012–0.016 kg ha−1), low phosphorus (0.20–0.19 kg ha−1), high potassium (4.07–4.28 kg ha−1), and saturation (%) at 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 growing periods, respectively (Table 1). Nine wheat varieties (Alpu-2001, Soyer-02, Kate-A1, Bezostaja-1, Altay-2000, Müfitbey, Nacibey, Harmankaya-99, Sönmez-2001) were used in the study, which were grown varieties in Turkey. In the experiment, 60 kg phosphorus and 50 kg calcium fertilizers were applied to the hectare before sowing and half of them were applied with sowing and the other half before emergence. Three rates of N dose (0 (control), 50 and 100 kg ha−1) were applied as granules of urea (34.5% N). The experimental plots were 3 m × 5 m and consisted of 5 rows 0.5 m apart. Border rows were not included for any sampling. Potassium, as potassium sulfate (50% potassium) and phosphorus, as calcium superphosphate (43% phosphorus), were applied for each plot as basal fertilizer at rates.

Table 1:
Some chemical characteristics of the soil in the field area.
Years Salt (%) *Saturation (%) pH N (kg ha−1) P (kg ha−1) K (kg ha−1)
2021 0.034 118.8 5.78 0.012 0.20 4.07
2022 0.046 116.6 6.62 0.016 0.19 4.28
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-1

Note:

Saturation > 110% is highly-clay.

The meteorological data during the growing seasons of wheat were given in Fig. 1. The region of investigation has a temperate climate, humid summers followed by rainy and warm winters. During the 2020–2021 growing season, the mean humidity ranged between 65.3% and 78.2%, while as in the 2021–2022 growing season, it ranged between 60.9% and 77.1%. Average precipitation and temperature values obtained in all years were close to each other (Fig. 1).

Climatic data for 10 days each during the growing season (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) from sowing to harvest at Ordu, Turkey.

Figure 1: Climatic data for 10 days each during the growing season (2020–2021 and 2021–2022) from sowing to harvest at Ordu, Turkey.

Methods of determination

Yield and agronomic traits

Plants were harvested at the maturity time, 270 days after planting. Ten plants in each pod were selected randomly to measure yield components, as seed yield, plant height, 1,000 seed weight, the number of spikelets per spike, the number of seeds per spike, spike length, number of spikes. All observations and measurements were made according to the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) criteria.

Chlorophyll content and flag leaf area index

The chlorophyll content (SPAD value) and flag leaf area index were determined on the flag leaves of selected ten plants of every plot in three growth times (1st growth time; early, 2nd growth time; the middle and end of flowering, 3rd growth time; with a 10 day interval). Chlorophyll content (SPAD value) was measured by the Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The measurements were done five times for each flag leaf, and the mean was calculated as the SPAD value of the given flag leaf. Leaf area measurements were made using a LI-3000 area meter (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Both chlorophyll content and leaf area measurements were measured from the same flag leaves of the same ten selected plants.

Characteristics of stomata

Stoma measurements were made on the flag leaves of the plants during the antesis period. Epidermis of the leaves were cleaned with ethanol. The transparent nail polish was applied on the abaxial and adaxial sides of the flag leaves to form a thin layer. The nail polish was allowed to dry for 20–30 min. The nail polish layer was peeled off using tweezers and placed on a glass slide for observation under a microscope. Parameters like stomatal density (no/mm2), stoma length (µm), stoma width (µm), stomatal index (%) and epidermal cells (no/mm2) were recorded. Three field of view during observation were randomly selected for each slide and the number of stomata in each field of view was counted. The stomatal density was calculated on a leaf surface basis, and stomatal index was calculated as: number of stomata/(number of stomata + number of epidermal cells) (Zhao et al., 2005).

Statistical analysis

In order to decide on the analysis method to be performed, Skewness and Kurtosis values were examined (±3.29) and it was determined that the data were compatible with normal distribution (±1.36). Factorial randomized complete block design (RCBD) (Model 1) was used in the study and variety and N dose were considered as fixed factors. Comparisons between years were determined by t test.

γijk=μ+αi+βj+(αβ)ij+ϵijk

α: Variety

β: N doses

αβ: Variety X N dose

ϵ: Error

In order to determine the appropriate multiple comparison test, the Levene homogeneity test was performed and when it was determined that the data were homogeneous, the TUKEY multiple comparison analysis was decided. The TUKEY (Model 2) multiple comparison test was used at the 0.01 or 0.05 level, depending on the degree of significance, if there was a significant difference between the components.

HSD=qxMSWn

Analysis of variance was performed with SPSS 24.0 software (SPSS Inc., IL, USA).

In this study, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to enable better analysis of the high-dimensional dataset and to optimize the impact of dimensions during the modelling process. PCA evaluated the relationships among the variables in the dataset and identified a few principal components that explain the variance best.

PCA was conducted using the “FactoMineR” package (Lê, Josse & Husson, 2008) and visualized with “factoextra” (Kassambara & Mundt, 2020) in R. The dataset was standardized to ensure comparability across variables. The N dose groups (N0: 0 kg ha−1, N1: 50 kg ha−1, N2: 100 kg ha−1) and wheat varieties (V1–V9) were included as a grouping factor separately, and confidence ellipses were added to illustrate variability within each group.

Variable contributions to the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2) were analyzed to identify key traits driving the observed patterns. Results were visualized with a biplot combining individuals and variables, and a variable contribution plot was created to highlight the relative influence of each variable.

Results

All parameters except plant height and spike length values were not statistically affected by the years and no significant difference was observed between 2020–2021 growing season and 2021–2022 growing season (Figs. 2A, 2B).

T test significance control of the difference between the first and second growing season (years) between the parameters examined in wheat (A, B).

Figure 2: T test significance control of the difference between the first and second growing season (years) between the parameters examined in wheat (A, B).

**P ≤ 0.01; ns, non significant SY; Seed yield; PH, Plant height; TGW, 1,000 seed weight; NSS, Number of spikelets; NS, Number of spike; NGS, Number of grains; CLO, Chlorophyll content; ABSW, Abaxial stomata width; ADSW, Adaxial stomata width; FLA, Flag leaf area; ABSH, Abaxial stomatal height; ADSH, Adaxial stomatal height; SD, Stomata density; SI, Stomata index and ECN, Epidermal cell number.

Seed yield and agronomic traits

The effects of variety and N dose on yield and agronomic traits of wheat plant are given in Tables 2 and 3 both years. With the increase in nitrogen dose, an increase was observed in all parameters examined compared to the control and N2 dose gave the highest values. When the N dose increased from 0 to 100 kg ha−1, the change in seed yield increased from 3,659 to 5,511 kg ha−1 (increased 50.61%) at first year (Table 2), while from 3,859 to 5,696 kg ha−1 rise was obtained (increased 47.60%) at second year (Table 3). The highest seed yields were obtained from Müfitbey (5,044 kg ha−1 for 2020–2021 and 5,222 kg ha−1 for 2021−2022 growing seasons respectively) and Kate-A1 (4,900 kg ha−1 for 2020–2021 and 5,067 kg ha−1 for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively) varieties (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2:
Effects of treatment on yield and yield components of wheat in 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season (Nn mean ± sd).
Treatment Seed yield (kg ha−1) Plant height (cm) 1,000 seed weight (g) Number of spikelets (number/spike) Number of grains (number/spike) Spike length (cm) Number of spikes (number/m2)
N0 3,659 ± 327c 72.25 ± 7.93c 39.18 ± 2.67c 12.63 ± 1.60c 32.78 ± 4.12c 7.29 ± 0.92c 268.11 ± 38.58c
N1 4,689 ± 392b 85.24 ± 10.34b 41.27 ± 3.00b 15.63 ± 2.34b 41.85 ± 1.75b 8.44 ± 1.00b 313.15 ± 47.88b
N2 5,511 ± 409a 96.94 ± 11.03a 42.81 ± 3.21a 19.48 ± 2.34a 51.07 ± 5.10a 9.35 ± 1.19a 380.63 ± 35.83a
Mean 4,619 ± 848 84.81 ± 14.05 41.08 ± 3.29 15.91 ± 3.51 41.90 ± 8.45 8.36 ± 3.13 320.63 ± 61.73
V1 4,289 ± 775c 81.25 ± 7.31bc 41.09 ± 2.10cd 17.11 ± 2.57a 42.78 ± 8.56 8.22 ± 0.92b 316.00 ± 66.62ab
V2 4,644 ± 1,041abc 78.53 ± 12.76c 37.36 ± 0.91f 12.56 ± 1.67c 42.22 ± 8.97 7.68 ± 1.06b 313.67 ± 53.68ab
V3 4,900 ± 1,005ab 78.63 ± 11.05c 36.83 ± 1.34f 15.67 ± 2.50ab 42.33 ± 10.15 8.13 ± 1.33b 310.56 ± 40.68ab
V4 4,444 ± 979bc 86.20 ± 10.40abc 42.63 ± 2.89b 16.56 ± 3.64a 39.67 ± 8.63 10.20 ± 1.14a 322.00 ± 70.25ab
V5 4,478 ± 689bc 93.26 ± 14.28ab 39.43 ± 1.11e 14.00 ± 3.87bc 42.67 ± 7.26 8.30 ± 1.05b 353.56 ± 30.45ab
V6 5,044 ± 914a 76.70 ± 9.73c 42.31 ± 1.01bc 16.22 ± 4.18a 42.22 ± 8.67 8.64 ± 1.67b 357.44 ± 90.63a
V7 4,522 ± 670abc 84.90 ± 11.69abc 40.51 ± 2.32de 17.33 ± 3.54a 41.89 ± 9.64 8.10 ± 1.10b 322.89 ± 54.99a
V8 4,644 ± 639abc 89.20 ± 19.56abc 45.92 ± 2.37a 17.78 ± 2.91a 41.89 ± 8.72 8.40 ± 1.25b 280.44 ± 29.66b
V9 4,611 ± 948abc 94.64 ± 17.99a 43.70 ± 1.41b 16.00 ± 4.00a 41.44 ± 8.86 7.56 ± 0.89b 309.11 ± 79.01ab
Mean 4,619 ± 848 84.81 ± 14.05 41.08 ± 3.29 15.91 ± 3.51 41.90 ± 8.45 8.36 ± 3.13 320.63 ± 61.73
N doses (n = 3) ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Variety (n = 9) ** ** ** ** ns ** **
N doses x Variety (n = 27) ** ns ** ** ns ns *
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-2

Note:

a, b; different letters in the same column indicate the difference between averages. V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ns; non significant; sd, standard deviation.
Table 3:
Effects of treatment on yield and yield components of wheat in 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season (mean ± sd).
Treatment Seed yield (kg ha−1) Plant height (cm) 1,000 seed weight (g) Number of spikelets (number/spike) Number of grains (number/spike) Spike length (cm) Number of spikes (number/m2)
N0 3,859 ± 295c 85.66 ± 8.35b 39.71 ± 2.51c 12.74 ± 1.70c 34.44 ± 4.68c 6.29 ± 0.92c 295.11 ± 38.58c
N1 4,867 ± 394b 86.13 ± 9.93b 42.01 ± 2.88b 15.74 ± 2.18b 43.52 ± 2.86b 7.44 ± 1.00b 340.15 ± 47.88b
N2 5,696 ± 416a 99.27 ± 7.63a 43.33 ± 2.91a 19.59 ± 2.39a 52.63 ± 5.85a 8.35 ± 1.19a 407.63 ± 35.83a
Mean 4,807 ± 840 90.35 ± 10.67 41.68 ± 3.12 16.02 ± 3.51 43.53 ± 8.75 7.36 ± 1.33 347.63 ± 61.73
V1 4,533 ± 675c 93.75 ± 7.34ab 40.98 ± 2.06c 18.11 ± 2.57a 45.78 ± 8.56a 7.22 ± 0.92b 343.00 ± 66.62ab
V2 4,833 ± 1,050abc 93.23 ± 8.44ab 37.85 ± 1.06d 13.56 ± 1.67d 45.22 ± 8.97a 6.68 ± 1.06b 340.67 ± 53.68ab
V3 5,067 ± 1,021ab 97.65 ± 2.72a 38.00 ± 1.36d 14.67 ± 2.50cd 40.33 ± 10.15ab 7.13 ± 1.33b 337.56 ± 40.68ab
V4 4,644 ± 979bc 87.49 ± 9.69ab 43.63 ± 2.89ab 15.56 ± 3.64bcd 37.67 ± 8.63b 9.20 ± 1.14a 349.00 ± 70.25ab
V5 4,667 ± 712bc 93.70 ± 7.90ab 40.32 ± 0.96c 15.00 ± 3.87cd 44.67 ± 7.26a 7.30 ± 1.05b 380.56 ± 30.45a
V6 5,222 ± 922a 81.34 ± 11.21b 43.27 ± 0.85b 17.22 ± 4.18ab 44.22 ± 8.67ab 7.64 ± 1.67b 384.44 ± 90.63a
V7 4,711 ± 653bc 87.52 ± 12.72ab 41.17 ± 2.54c 18.33 ± 3.54a 44.89 ± 9.64a 7.10 ± 1.10b 349.89 ± 54.99ab
V8 4,800 ± 634abc 90.28 ± 11.34ab 44.92 ± 2.28a 16.78 ± 2.91abc 44.89 ± 8.72a 7.40 ± 1.25b 307.44 ± 29.66b
V9 4,789 ± 949abc 88.22 ± 14.98ab 45.01 ± 1.62a 15.00 ± 4.00cd 44.11 ± 8.55ab 6.56 ± 0.89b 336.11 ± 79.01ab
Mean 4,807 ± 840 90.35 ± 10.67 41.68 ± 3.12 16.02 ± 3.51 43.53 ± 8.75 7.36 ± 1.33 347.63 ± 61.73
N doses (n = 3) ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Variety (n = 9) ** ** ** ** ** ** **
N doses x Variety (n = 27) ** ns * ** ns ns *
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-3

Note:

a, b; different letters in the same column indicate the difference between averages. V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ns; non significant; sd, standard deviation.

The plant height was significantly affected by N dose and varieties, but it wasn’t significantly affected by their interactions. As the N dose increased from 0 to 50 kg ha−1, the plant height increased from 72.25 to 85.24 cm (increased 17.97%). Morever its increase from 50 to 100 kg ha−1 resulted in the the plant height growth from 85.24 to 96.94 cm (increased 28.23%) at first year (Table 2). In the second year, these increase rates were measured as 1.00% and 15.26%, respectively (Table 3). While the lowest plant height mean was obtained from Müfitbey wheat variety (76.70 cm for 2020–2021 and 81.34 cm for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively), the highest mean plant height was obtained from Sönmez-2001 wheat variety (94.64 cm) at first year and from Kate-A1 wheat variety (97.61 cm) at second year (Tables 2 and 3). When it comes to variety x nitrogen interaction obtained from the highest grain yield (V3), 1,000 grain weight (V8), the number of spikelet (V7) and the number of spike (V6) from N2 treatments (100 kg ha−1) were obtained at first year (Figs. 3A3D, respectively). N dose, varieties and variety x N dose interactions had significant effects on the 1,000 seed weight. The 1,000 seed weight increased from 5.36% as the N dose rate increased from 0 to 50 kg ha−1 at first year (Table 3). A similar increase rate (5.79%) was also observed at second year (Table 3). According to variance analysis the effect of N doses, varieties and interaction of N with varieties on the number spikelets were significant (Tables 2 and 3, both years). When the N dose increased from 0 to 100 kg ha−1, the change in number of spikelets increased from 12.63 to 19.48 number spike−1 in first year (Table 2) and increased from 12.74 to 19.59 number spike−1 in the second year. When the varieties were compared individually in terms of the number spikelet, the lowest was obtained from Soyer-02 variety (12.56 number spike−1 for 2020–2021 and 13.56 number spike−1 for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). While the number of grains per spike was significantly affected only by N dose at first year (Table 2), it was affected by variety and N dose at second year (Table 3). As the N dose rate increased from 0 to 50 kg ha−1, the number of grains per spike increased 27.66% and its increase from 50 to 100 kg ha−1 caused 22.03% growth in the number of grains per spike at first year (Table 2). Similar data was found in the second year was found similarly data (26.36% for 2020–2021and 20.93% for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively) (Table 3). The spike length was significantly affected by N dose, varieties and their interaction. Increasing the N dose rate from 0 to 50 kg ha−1 resulted in increased spike length (from 7.29 to 8.44 cm for 2020–2021 and 6.29 to 7.44 cm for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively). As the N doses increase from 50 to 100 kg ha−1 the rate of increase in spike length (from 8.44 to 9.35 cm for 2020–2021; 7.44 to 8.35 cm for 2021–2022 growing seasons, respectively) (Fig. 4). Among the varieties in terms of spike length, Bezostaja-1 variety stands out both years (Tables 2 and 3). N doses, varieties and their interactions had significant effects on the number of spikes (Tables 2, 3). The number of spikes increased from 268.11 to 380.63 (increased 41.96%) as a result of the N dose rate change from 0 to 100 kg ha−1 at first year, while this increase rate was 38.12% at second year (Tables 2 and 3). When the varieties were compared in terms of number of spikes, the lowest was obtained from Harmankaya-99 variety and the highest was obtained from Müfitbey variety in both years (Tables 2 and 3).

(A–D) Graphs of wheat yield and yield components of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season.

Figure 3: (A–D) Graphs of wheat yield and yield components of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season.

V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1.
(A-D) Graphs of wheat yield and yield components of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season.

Figure 4: (A-D) Graphs of wheat yield and yield components of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season.

V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay- 2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1.

Chlorophyll content (SPAD value)

Chlorophyll content was affected by the N dose, variety, growth stage for both years. Chlorophyll content increased 19.6% for 2020–2021 and 20.55% for 2021–2022 growing season as the N dose rate increased from 0 to 50 kg ha−1, respectively years. As the N dose rate increased from 50 to 100 kg ha−1 the chlorophyll content increased in 15.13% and 14.64%, in the first and second years respectively. Chlorophyll content decreased as the growth period progressed in both of years. The highest chlorophyll content was obtained from variety of V7 (Nacibey) in both years (Table 4).

Table 4:
Effects of Treatment on chlorophyll content of wheat in 2021–2022 and 2021–2022 growing season (mean ± sd).
2020–2021 growing season 2021–2022 growing season
Treatment Chlorophyll (SPAD value) Treatment Chlorophyll (SPAD value)
N0 22.96 ± 5.66c N0 23.40 ± 5.69c
N1 27.48 ± 5.44b N1 28.21 ± 5.54b
N2 31.64 ± 6.27a N2 32.34 ± 6.39a
Mean 27.35 ± 6.75 Mean 27.98 ± 6.88
GS1 29.86 ± 6.80a GS1 30.58 ± 6.99a
GS2 27.52 ± 6.34a GS2 28.00 ± 6.41a
GS3 24.69 ± 6.25b GS3 25.38 ± 6.39b
Mean 27.35 ± 6.75 Mean 27.98 ± 6.88
N doses (n = 3) ** N doses (n = 3) **
Growth Stage (n = 3) ** Growth stage (n = 3) **
N doses x Growth Stage (n = 9) ns N doses x Growth Stage (n = 9) ns
N0 22.96 ± 4.82c N0 24.92 ± 4.97c
N1 27.48 ± 4.72b N1 29.20 ± 4.93b
N2 31.64 ± 5.40a N2 33.58 ± 5.12a
Mean 27.36 ± 4.98 Mean 29.23 ± 5.01
V1 21.41 ± 4.25c V1 22.97 ± 4.92c
V2 20.75 ± 5.48c V2 22.82 ± 5.64c
V3 30.84 ± 5.58a V3 32.64 ± 4.99a
V4 29.34 ± 5.00ab V4 31.09 ± 4.75ab
V5 28.01 ± 3.42ab V5 30.14 ± 2.84ab
V6 24.03 ± 2.31bc V6 26.13 ± 2.48bc
V7 33.20 ± 5.59a V7 34.98 ± 5.60a
V8 29.04 ± 3.47ab V8 30.79 ± 3.69ab
V9 29.59 ± 6.19a V9 31.56 ± 6.56a
Mean 27.36 ± 4.98 Mean 29.23 ± 5.01t
N doses (n = 3) ** N doses (n = 3) **
Variety (n = 9) ** Variety (n = 9) **
N doses x Variety (n = 27) ns N doses x Variety (n = 27) ns
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-4

Note:

a, b; different letters in the same column indicate the difference between averages. V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1; **P ≤ 0.01; ns, non significant; sd, standard deviation; GS, Growth stage.

Flag leaf area

N doses, varieties and their interactions had significant effects on the flag leaf area. Flag leaf area increased with increasing nitrogen doses and the highest was found at N2 treatment. The highest flag leaf area was determined from variety Bezostaja-1, while the lowest flag leaf area index was obtained from variety Soyer-02 in both years (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5:
Effects of treatment on flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of wheat in 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season (Nn mean ± sd).
Nitrogen dose Flag leaf area (cm2) Abaxial stomata width (µm) Abaxial stomata length (µm) Adaxial stomata width (µm) Adaxial stomata length (µm) Epidermal cell (no./mm2) Stomata density (no./mm2) Stomata index (%)
N0 25.31 ± 4.99c 28.94 ± 4.15c 53.49 ± 3.73c 30.44 ± 4.15c 52.36 ± 4.19c 539.59 ± 55.04c 138.44 ± 11.50c 20.78 ± 4.41c
N1 27.90 ± 5.50b 32.89 ± 3.02b 57.40 ± 3.14b 34.39 ± 3.02b 55.90 ± 3.14b 584.11 ± 48.10b 149.22 ± 12.35b 26.11 ± 6.41b
N2 30.75 ± 7.02a 36.79 ± 1.89a 60.09 ± 2.87a 38.29 ± 1.89a 58.59 ± 2.87a 604.41 ± 47.01a 158.15 ± 11.47a 32.11 ± 6.82a
Mean 27.98 ± 6.23 32.87 ± 4.48 56.99 ± 4.22 34.37 ± 4.48 55.61 ± 4.26 576.03 ± 56.53 148.60 ± 14.17 26.33 ± 7.51
V1 21.74 ± 1.15d 32.28 ± 3.43abc 59.72 ± 1.80ab 33.78 ± 3.43abc 58.22 ± 1.80ab 622.00 ± 14.71b 154.78 ± 7.90bc 31.89 ± 7.83b
V2 23.30 ± 1.50d 33.63 ± 3.43abc 57.87 ± 3.41abc 35.13 ± 3.43abc 56.37 ± 3.41abc 591.78 ± 53.11c 151.00 ± 12.85d 30.56 ± 9.48b
V3 23.30 ± 1.21d 34.94 ± 2.44ab 54.56 ± 3.53c 36.44 ± 2.44ab 53.06 ± 3.53c 574.56 ± 40.98d 142.67 ± 9.96e 24.89 ± 6.97d
V4 36.22 ± 4.85a 30.06 ± 6.07c 56.49 ± 4.15bc 31.56 ± 6.07c 54.99 ± 4.15bb 513.67 ± 15.58f 133.00 ± 9.45g 19.22 ± 3.31f
V5 32.08 ± 1.54b 31.73 ± 5.40bc 58.14 ± 4.34abc 33.23 ± 5.40bc 57.76 ± 4.23ab 611.56 ± 15.81b 155.33 ± 5.20b 27.89 ± 2.98c
V6 26.17 ± 1.03c 30.13 ± 7.12c 54.02 ± 3.68c 31.63 ± 7.12c 52.52 ± 3.68c 500.33 ± 48.96f 137.44 ± 6.69f 21.11 ± 3.82e
V7 33.83 ± 1.71ab 35.95 ± 3.02a 55.37 ± 5.13c 37.45 ± 3.02a 53.87 ± 5.13bc 583.78 ± 30.12cd 152.56 ± 10.01cd 27.33 ± 4.80c
V8 32.76 ± 6.84b 32.96 ± 1.73abc 61.45 ± 2.35a 34.46 ± 1.73abc 59.95 ± 2.35a 647.00 ± 30.76a 171.56 ± 9.53a 34.78 ± 3.87a
V9 22.50 ± 4.16d 34.19 ± 2.40ab 55.33 ± 3.71c 35.69 ± 2.40ab 53.83 ± 3.71bc 539.67 ± 19.69e 139.11 ± 8.15f 19.33 ± 2.96f
Mean 27.98 ± 6.23 32.87 ± 4.48 56.99 ± 4.22 34.37 ± 4.48 55.61 ± 4.26 576.03 ± 56.53 148.60 ± 14.17 26.33 ± 7.51
N doses (n = 27) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Variety (n = 9) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
N doses x Variety (n = 3) ** ** ns ** ns ** ** **
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-5

Note:

a, b; different letters in the same column indicate the difference between averages. V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg h−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1; **P ≤ 0.01; ns, non significant; sd, standard deviation.
Table 6:
Effects of treatment on flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of wheat in 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season (Nn mean ± sd).
Nitrogen dose Flag leaf area (cm2) Abaxial stomata width (µm) Abaxial stomata length (µm) Adaxial stomata width (µm) Adaxial stomata length (µm) Epidermal cell (no./mm2) Stomata density (no./mm2) Stomata index (%)
N0 25.26 ± 5.04c 29.94 ± 4.15c 52.86 ± 4.19c 31.44 ± 4.15c 51.36 ± 4.19c 546.59 ± 55.04c 140.44 ± 11.50c 22.78 ± 4.41c
N1 28.05 ± 5.09b 33.89 ± 3.02b 56.40 ± 3.14b 35.39 ± 3.02b 54.90 ± 3.14b 591.11 ± 48.10b 151.22 ± 12.35b 28.11 ± 6.41b
N2 32.87 ± 8.07a 37.79 ± 1.89a 59.09 ± 2.87a 39.29 ± 1.89a 57.59 ± 2.87a 611.41 ± 47.01a 160.15 ± 11.47a 34.11 ± 6.82a
Mean 28.72 ± 6.91 33.87 ± 4.48 56.11 ± 4.26 35.37 ± 4.48 54.61 ± 4.26 583.03 ± 56.53 150.60 ± 14.17 28.33 ± 7.51
V1 21.54 ± 1.33e 33.28 ± 3.43abc 58.72 ± 1.80ab 34.78 ± 3.43abc 57.22 ± 1.80ab 629.00 ± 14.71b 156.78 ± 7.90bc 33.89 ± 7.83b
V2 22.62 ± 1.19e 34.63 ± 3.43abc 56.87 ± 3.41abc 36.13 ± 3.43abc 55.37 ± 3.41abc 598.78 ± 53.11c 153.00 ± 12.85d 32.56 ± 9.48b
V3 22.94 ± 1.02de 35.94 ± 2.44ab 53.56 ± 3.53c 37.44 ± 2.44ab 52.06 ± 3.53c 581.56 ± 40.98d 144.67 ± 9.96e 26.89 ± 6.97d
V4 35.39 ± 5.24a 31.06 ± 6.07c 55.49 ± 4.15bc 32.56 ± 6.07c 53.99 ± 4.15bc 520.67 ± 15.58f 135.00 ± 9.45g 21.22 ± 3.31f
V5 35.54 ± 2.53a 32.73 ± 5.40bc 58.26 ± 4.23ab 34.23 ± 5.40bc 56.76 ± 4.23ab 618.56 ± 15.81b 157.33 ± 5.20b 29.89 ± 2.98c
V6 25.81 ± 1.28d 31.13 ± 7.12c 53.02 ± 3.68c 32.63 ± 7.12c 51.52 ± 3.68c 507.33 ± 48.96f 139.44 ± 6.69f 23.11 ± 3.82e
V7 34.38 ± 5.82ab 36.95 ± 3.02a 54.37 ± 5.13bc 38.45 ± 3.02a 52.87 ± 5.13bc 590.78 ± 30.12cd 154.56 ± 10.01cd 29.33 ± 4.80c
V8 31.30 ± 7.48bc 33.96 ± 1.73abc 60.45 ± 2.35a 35.46 ± 1.73abc 58.95 ± 2.35a 654.00 ± 30.76a 173.56 ± 9.53a 36.78 ± 3.87a
V9 29.00 ± 7.48c 35.19 ± 2.40ab 54.33 ± 3.71bc 36.69 ± 2.40ab 52.83 ± 3.71bc 546.67 ± 19.69e 141.11 ± 8.15f 21.33 ± 2.96f
Mean 28.72 ± 6.91 33.87 ± 4.48 56.11 ± 4.26 35.37 ± 4.48 54.61 ± 4.26 583.03 ± 56.53 150.60 ± 14.17 28.33 ± 7.51
N doses (n = 27) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Variety (n = 9) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
N doses x Variety (n = 3) ** ** ns ** ns ** ** **
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/table-6

Note:

a, b; different letters in the same column indicate the difference between averages. V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1; **P ≤ 0.01; ns, non significant; sd, standard deviation.

As the N dose rate increased from 0 to 50 kg ha−1, the flag leaf area increased from 25.31 to 27.90 cm2 (10.23%), and similarly as the N dose rate increased from 50 to 100 kg ha−1, the flag leaf area increased 10.21% at first year. In the second year, this ratio was determined between 11.04% and 17.18%, in relation to N doses respectively. The variation of flag leaf area index of the varieties was found between 21.74–36.22 cm2 (first year) and between 21.54–35.54 cm2 (second year) (Tables 5 and 6).

The highest flag leaf area (V4), N2 treatment (100 kg ha−1) was obtained from variety x nitrogen interaction at both years (Figs. 5A, 6A).

(A–F) Graphs of wheat flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season.

Figure 5: (A–F) Graphs of wheat flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2020–2021 (1st year) growing season.

V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1.
(A–F) Graphs of wheat flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season.

Figure 6: (A–F) Graphs of wheat flag leaf area and stomatal characteristics of the interaction of variety and nitrogen doses in the 2021–2022 (2nd year) growing season.

V1, Alpu-2001; V2, Soyer-02; V3, Kate-A1; V4, Bezostaja-1; V5, Altay-2000; V6, Müfitbey; V7, Nacibey; V8, Harmankaya-99; V9, Sönmez-2001; Nitrogen doses, N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1.

Characteristics of stomata

The changes of N dose had significant effects on abaxial and adaxial stomata width and length, epidermal cell, stomata density and stomata index in this study. There was an increase in these parameters with the increase in nitrogen doses.

Among the varieties abaxial width changed between 30.06 and 35.95 µm in the first year; 31.06 and 36.95 µm in the second year. Abaxial stomata length was obtained from 54.02 and 61.45 µm for 2020–2021; 53.02 and 60.45 µm for 2021–2022 growing season, respectively years (Tables 5 and 6). When the 1st and 2nd year abaxial stomata width (µm), abaxial stomata length (µm), adaxial stomata width (µm), adaxial stomata length (µm), epidermal cell (no/mm2), stomata density (no/mm2) and stomata index (%) data were examined, the variety x nitrogen dose interaction was found to be significant in all parameters except abaxial stomata length (µm) and adaxial stomata length (µm). When the 1st year data is examined the highest abaxial stomata width was obtained from variety Nacibey and 100 kg ha−1 N dose interactions (39.27 µm) and the lowest adaxial stomata width was obtained from Bezostaja-1variety and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (22.77 µm). The highest abaxial stomata length was obtained from variety Harmankaya-99 and 100 kg ha−1 N dose (62.46 µm) and the lowest abaxial stomata width was obtained from Nacibey variety and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (49.53 µm). N doses had significant effects on the abaxial and adaxial stomata length in the wheat. As N doses increase, abaxial and adaxial stomata length also increases respectively (Fig. 5). N doses, varieties and N dose x variety interactions had significant effects on the adaxial stomata width. The highest adaxial stomata width was obtained from Nacibey variety and 100 kg ha−1 N dose interactions (41.77 µm) and the lowest adaxial stomata width was obtained from variety Bezostaja 1 and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (25.27 µm). N doses had significant effects on the adaxial stomata width in the wheat. As N doses increase stomata width also increases respectively (Fig. 5). The highest abaxial stomata width (second year) was obtained from Nacibey variety and 100 kg ha−1 N dose interactions (40.27 µm) and the lowest adaxial stomata width was obtained from variety Bezostaja 1 and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (23.77 µm). The highest abaxial stomata length was obtained from Harmankaya-99 variety and 100 kg ha−1 N dose (61.46 µm) and the lowest abaxial stomata width was obtained from Nacibey variety and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (48.53 µm). N doses had significant effects on the abaxial and adaxial stomata length in the wheat. As N doses increase, abaxial and adaxial stomata length also increases respectively (Fig. 6). N doses, varieties and N dose x variety interactions had significant effects on the adaxial stomata width. The highest adaxial stomata width was obtained from Nacibey variety and 100 kg ha−1 N dose interactions (41.77 µm) and the lowest adaxial stomata width was obtained from Bezostaja-1 variety and control (0 kg ha−1 N) dose interactions (25.27 µm). N doses had significant effects on the adaxial stomata width in the wheat. As N doses increase stomata width also increases respectively (Fig. 6). In the 1st and 2nd years, N dose x variety interactions had no significant effect on abaxial and adaxial stomata length. However, abaxial and adaxial stomata lengths changed depending on N doses and varieties. In the 1st year data, as N doses increased, abaxial and adaxial stomata length values increased by 12.3% from 53.49 to 60.09 and 11.8% from 52.36 to 58.59, respectively (Table 5). As N doses increased, abaxial and adaxial stomata length values increased 11.7% from 52.86 to 59.09 and 12.1% from 51.36 to 57.59, respectively (2nd year). In the 1st and 2nd year data, the highest abaxial and adaxial stomata lengths were obtained from the Harmankaya-99 variety (61.45, 60.45 µm and 59.95, 58.95 µm, respectively) (Tables 5 and 6). In the 1st and 2nd years, N dose x variety interactions had a significant effect on epidermal cell (no/mm2), stomatal density (no/mm2), and stomatal index (%). In the 1st year data, the epidermal cell value was highest in the Harmankaya-99 (from 614 to 679.33, 10.6%) variety, and the lowest in the Müfitbey (from 439 to 548.33, 24.9%) variety (Fig. 5). In the 2nd year data, the epidermal cell value was similar to the 1st year data, and the highest value was in the Harmankaya-99 (from 621 to 686.33, 10.5%) variety, and the lowest value was in the Müfitbey (from 446 to 555.33, 24.5%) variety (Fig. 6). In the 1st year data, the stomata density value was lowest in the Müfitbey (from 144 to 129, 10.6%) variety and highest in the Sönmez-2001 (from 148 to 129) variety (Fig. 5). In the 2nd year data, the stomata density value was similar to the 1st year data and the lowest value was highest in the Müfitbey (from 146 to 131) variety and highest in the Sönmez-2001 (from 150 to 131) variety (Fig. 6). In the 1st year data, the highest stomata index value was seen in the varieties Soyer-02, Alpu-2001, and Harmankaya-99 (from 28.66 to 40, from 23.33 to 41, and from 30 to 38.66, respectively) in the same statistical group (Fig. 5). In the 2nd year data, the stomata index value was similar to the 1st year data and the highest values were reached in the varieties Soyer-02, Alpu-2001, and Harmankaya-99 (from 20.66 to 42, from 25 to 43, and from 32 to 40.66, respectively) in the same statistical group (Fig. 5). In addition, all parameters except plant height and spike length values were not statistically affected by the years and no significant difference was observed between the years (Table 6).

Principal component analysis (pca)

A PCA was performed to explore the relationships among measured variables and assess how nitrogen doses (N0, N1, N2) influence the dataset of nine varieties of wheat. The PCA biplot revealed a clear separation among the nitrogen dose groups, reflecting differences in their multidimensional profiles.

The first and two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2) accounted for a significant proportion of the total variance in the dataset, with Dim1 explaining 50.5% and Dim2 explaining 13.3%. Together, they captured the major trends within the data. According to the principal component analysis, the traits examined in the study were grouped into two main groups in terms of colour and length. The first group (Dim 1) consisted of seed yield (SY), plant height (PH), thousand grain weight (TGW), number of spikelets (NSS), number of spike (NS), number of grains (NGS), chlorophyll content (CLO), abaxial stomata width (ABSW), adaxial stomata width (ADSW) and flag leaf area (FLA) components that demonstrated strong positive intercorrelations. These features are associated with productivity and photosynthetic capacity, both of which are directly influenced by nitrogen availability. The second group (Dim 2) consisted of abaxial stomatal height (ABSH), adaxial stomatal height (ADSH), stoma density (SD), stoma index (SI) and epidermal cell number (ECN) that features represents stomatal and cellular characteristics. These components primarily aligned along Dim2 and has shown strong positive intercorrelations (Fig. 7). All the analyzed features showed nearly positive correlations while epidermal cell number (ECN) and flag leaf area (FLA) exhibited non correlation.

Variable contribution plot for the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2) from the PCA analysis.

Figure 7: Variable contribution plot for the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2) from the PCA analysis.

The length, direction and the color of the arrows in the PCA represents the contribution of each variable to the first two principal components. SY, Seed yield; PH, Plant height; TGW, 1,000 seed weight; NSS, Number of spikelets; NS, Number of spike; NGS, Number of grains; CLO, Chlorophyll content; ABSW, Abaxial stomata width; ADSW, Adaxial stomata width; FLA, Flag leaf area; ABSH, Abaxial stomatal height; ADSH, Adaxial stomatal height; SD, Stomata density; SI, Stomata index and ECN, Epidermal cell number.

The nitrogen dose groups were distinctly separated along Dim1 and Dim2. The control group (N0) clustered toward the negative end of Dim1, suggesting lower values of variables strongly associated with this dimension. This indicates a limited growth response in the absence of nitrogen. In contrast, the 100 kg ha−1 N dose group (N2) positioned toward the positive end of Dim2, indicating higher growth and yield parameters. The 50 kg ha−1 N dose group (N1) occupied an intermediate position, bridging the control and 100 kg ha−1 N groups, showed moderate increases in features (Fig. 8). Interestingly, stomatal traits (Dim2) show less dramatic shifts across N levels, suggesting that these features are less directly affected by N dosage. The results highlight the dose-dependent effects of N on plant development and productivity parameters.

PCA biplot illustrating the distribution of individuals across the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2).

Figure 8: PCA biplot illustrating the distribution of individuals across the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2).

Nitrogen dose groups (N0, Control; N1, 50 kg ha−1; N2, 100 kg ha−1) are color-coded, with ellipses representing 95% confidence intervals for each group. Variable loadings are depicted as arrows, highlighting their contributions to Dim1 and Dim2 and the group separation.

The color gradient in Fig. 9 represents the contribution of each variety to the principal components. Varieties with higher contributions, such as Bezostaja-1 (V4) and Sönmez- 2001 (V9), are more influential in defining the axes of variation. This highlights the importance of varietal differences in the effectiveness of nitrogen application.

PCA biplot illustrating the distribution of individuals across the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2).

Figure 9: PCA biplot illustrating the distribution of individuals across the first two dimensions (Dim1 and Dim2).

Variety groups (V1–V9) are color-coded, with ellipses representing 95% confidence intervals for each group. Variable loadings are depicted as arrows, highlighting their contributions to Dim1 and Dim2 and the group separation.

Discussion

There is a relationship between the N dose and the yield (Paul et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2019). As we found in the present study, seed yield and agronomic traits had positive relations with N dose treatments. Many studies have reported that increase of N also increase yield and agronomic traits (Fang et al., 2018; Lollato et al., 2019; Liu, Liao & Liu, 2021). In our study, as N doses increased, all yield and morphological parameters increased as well. High N dose stimulates the development of vegetative organs and reduces the amount of assimilation carried to the spikes (Sun et al., 2019). While the high values obtained in the examined properties were obtained from the highest N dose, the percentage of increase occurring in the increase from control (0 kg ha−1) to 50 kg ha−1 was greater than the percentage of increase occurring in the increase from 50 to 100 kg ha−1. The highest seed yield was obtained from 100 kg ha−1 nitrogen application in our study. Kayan et al. (2020) determined 100 kg ha−1 as the most suitable N dose in terms of seed yield and N efficiency among N doses. The rapid response of seed yield to N increases at low N levels is due to the increase in tiller formation and the resulting increase in seed number when the soil N amount is insufficient for maximum yield (Hoogmoed et al., 2018). Despite the potential increase in plant N concentration, subsequent slow growth phases indicate that increases in N uptake per plant beyond the maximum yield response point result in low improvement in yield per plant (Xu et al., 2018). Different N dose could improve the photosynthetic capacity by regulating the plant height, thereby increasing production (Lollato et al., 2019). As a result of the correlation, it was determined that seed yield was highly positively correlated with plant height, number of spikelets per spikes, number of seeds per spike and 1,000 seeds weight with increase N treatment in both years in our study (Table 2). Xue et al. (2006) reported that N dose improved yield by increasing seed number. That the improving number of spikes and number of seeds per spike may be the primary factors for increasing yield (Si et al., 2020). Saleem et al. (2010) stated that more studies are required to identify wheat cultivars that maintain high seed yield with lower N dose requirements. That researchers found seed yield increased significantly and progressively with each increment of N from 0 to 150 kg ha−1, further addition of N above 150 kg ha−1 did not lead to additional increase, but rather decrease in seed yield ha−1.

According to our results, chlorophyll content in the flag leaf varied among N doses and growth times. While chlorophyll content increased as N doses increased, chlorophyll values were found higher in early growth period than from late growth periods. N, which is found in the structure of chlorophylls that play a role in photosynthesis, is very important for chlorophylls (Zangani et al., 2021). Most of the N is found in the leaf in chloroplasts and mostly in ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (Makino et al., 1997). Therefore, in case of N deficiency, there will be a decrease in rubisco activity and a decrease in photosynthesis. Photosynthesis plays a direct role in the growth, development and yield of plants. Therefore, changes in pigments that play a role in photosynthesis mean changes in the rate of photosynthesis in plants (Sallam et al., 2019). As a result, seed yield decreases (Tóth et al., 2002). The amount of chlorophyll varies between species and may also vary within a species. In addition, leaf structure is one of the important factors that determine the amount of chlorophyll (Criado et al., 2007). In our study the highest chlorophyll content was found of Bezostaja-1 and Nacibey wheat varieties (V4 and V7, respectively) both of years due to the highest flag leaf area. The excess chlorophyll content in plants stimulates growth and development while increasing yield. The study results confirm the data and draw attention to the role of N in yield increase (Sharifi & Mohammadkhani, 2016). In addition, the chlorophyll content of flag leaves in grasses can provide important clues about the growth and development status of plants (Qian et al., 2021; Pandey et al., 2023). Also, the amount of chlorophyll in plants varies depending on time during the vegetation period (Čaňová, Ďurkovič & Hladká, 2008) and it is closely related to plant photosynthetic capacity (Zhang et al., 2022), N is transferred from leaves to spikes, resulting in a decrease in spectral reflectance and chlorophyll content (Zavoruev & Zavorueva, 2003). Shirazi et al. (2014) reported that leaf area is an important indicator of crop growth. Biomass production in plants is closely related to leaf area (Man, Yu & Shi, 2017). Li et al. (2023) stated that the leaf area increases, the amount of biomass and seed yield also increases. While the leaf area was 25.28 cm2 at the control dose, it increased to 31.80 cm2 at the 100 kg ha−1 dose. This showed an increase of 25.79% in the leaf area. The increase in biomass production will play an important role in improving the yield of wheat, and increased biomass production should be given priority to increase seed production of wheat (Li et al., 2023). In our study, an increase in leaf area was observed with increasing N doses, thus an increase in yield was observed.

Chlorophyll content in flag leaf starts to decrease with time after antesis, regardless of treatments and varieties, as plants undergo natural senescence during seed filling (Kumar et al., 2022). Steer & Harrigan (1986) reported an average decrease of 23% in chlorophyll content from antesis to physiological maturity (Zhao et al., 2005). In line with previous studies, our research findings indicate a decrease in chlorophyll content as the growth stages is delayed.

Decreases in chlorophyll content may mark the start of senescence (Bassi, Menossi & Mattiello, 2018). Indeed, in studies conducted in sugar cane, total chlorophyll content was found to be higher in young leaves and with increased N treatments (Bassi, Menossi & Mattiello, 2018). In our study, 1st growth stages (GS1) of wheat was found the highest chlorophyll content.

In addition, parameters such as the position of stomata on the leaf (being lower or upper) and stomata density, which play an active role in gas exchange parameters, are parameters that increase the functionality of the chlorophyll in photosynthesis (Wasaya et al., 2021). Therefore, the reason for the yield differences between varieties can be associated with changes in these parameters.

Stomata of flag leaf are an effective property in the compatibility of varieties to different environmental conditions, which can have an important role in gaining high performance. However, this effectiveness can be affected by environmental conditions and different growing seasons (Anjum et al., 2011; Limochi & Eskandari, 2013; Caine et al., 2019). The stomatal traits help plants maintain photosynthetic rates under water deficit (Ding et al., 2018) and high temperature (Reynolds-Henne et al., 2010; Farooq et al., 2011; Sharma et al., 2015; Urban et al., 2017; Caine et al., 2023). The open stomata maintain adequate gas exchange for photosynthesis, which is vital for plant metabolism (Sayed, 2003; Reynolds-Henne et al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2015; Tricker et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2020). With increased photosynthesis, plant productivity increases. However, depending on the plant species, one or more of the same stress factors may have different effects on stomata (Merilo et al., 2014; Sharma et al., 2015; Sommer et al., 2023) and, stomata density and size in cultivated wheat tend to be larger and sparser than in wild species (Wang et al., 2022).

The plants increase the number of stomata to minimize transpiration and water loss and closing stomata (Yavas et al., 2024). The researcher stated that planting date and varieties were found significant effects on all anatomical properties including stomata area, stomata diameter and stomata number of rice. Early planting (22 May) reduced the area and diameter of stomata, also grain yield. Grain yield showed maximum correlation with stomata area (0.405). Researchers suggested that this property can be used as an important factor in breeding programs for improving rice grain yield (Limochi & Eskandari, 2013).

In our study, all stomatal parameters increased with increasing N doses (Tables 5 and 6). and among the wheat varieties, the highest stomatal index and density were obtained from Harmankaya-99 wheat variety (V8) (Figs. 5E and 6E) in both years. It has been determined that the criteria considered in this study, together with N doses, show significant effects among varieties, and therefore yield increases are achieved at significant levels.

The effect of N fertilizer applications on stomatal conductance, flag leaf area and other physiological parameters of sorghum was found to be insignificant (Bruns, 2016). In another study, the N fertilizer increased, stomatal conductance of rapeseed increased as much as 21%, and it was not statistically significant for rapeseed (Nasab et al., 2014).

The flag leaf is the main component of the canopy in growth stages of wheat, and it determines the grain-filling rate and the yield (Vicente et al., 2018). Some studies have shown that the number and density of stomata significantly affect their ability to regulate photosynthesis and transpiration. The stomatal density of wheat flag leaves increased under limited water irrigation, and later irrigation resulted in greater stomatal density. Also, the stomatal length and width decreased, stomatal density of plant leaves increased and the stomata got smaller under stress conditions, but changes in the stomatal shape varied greatly (Bertolino, Caine & Gray, 2019; Liu, Liao & Liu, 2021).

In the present study, according to the principal component analysis, PCA biplot that visualizes the relationships between different varieties of a particular dataset. The x-axis represents the first principal component (Dim1), which accounts for 50.5% of the variance in the data, while the y-axis represents the second principal component (Dim2), which accounts for 13.3% of the variance. The data points, representing the different varieties, are colored and sized according to their contribution (Contrib) and variety (Variety), respectively. Varieties that are closer together on the plot are more similar to each other, while those that are farther apart are more distinct. The arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of the correlation between the principal components and the original variables. Varieties with longer arrows have a stronger influence on the principal components. This PCA biplot provides a useful overview of the underlying structure of the dataset, allowing the researcher to identify patterns, clusters, and relationships between the different varieties. The information gleaned from this analysis can inform further research, product development, or other desicion-making processes. Koppensteiner et al. (2022) stated that for experimental data at 0 g N m-2, PC1 explained 55.3% experimental data of all N fertilization rates, PC1 carried 51.5% and PC2 28.9% of variation summing up to 80.4%. Similarly, Zewdu, Mekonnen & Geleta (2024) were the first four principal components accounted for 76.76% of the total observed phenotypic variation at the results of principal component analysis. Tunç, Yılmaz & Yaman (2023) stated that in their research on the olive varieties that the first five components consisted of 79.08% of the total variation in terms of stomatal morphology and chlorophyll content.

As researchers have stated that principal component analysis of yield and yield components in wheat generally show highly varying results which can be attributed to varying experimental and environmental conditions (Ozukum et al., 2019; Nayana, Kumar & Chesneau, 2022; Bonfil et al., 2023).

Conclusions

This research has confirmed the hypothesis that nitrogen is an effective element on growth, development, productivity, chlorophyll content, abaxial stomata width, abaxial stomata length, adaxial stomata width, adaxial stomata length, epidermal cells, stomata cells, stomata density and stomata index in plants. In this 2-year study, the increase in N dose boosted the number of spikelets per plant, the number of seeds per spike and 1,000 seed weight, and accordingly, seed yield per hectare increased. In addition, as the leaf area index increased, so did the chlorophyll amount and stomata size and thus photosynthetic efficiency increased and accordingly, the amount of matter accumulated in the seed increased. It was determined that the best results in yield and other parameters examined were obtained from the 100 kg ha−1 N dose. The hypothesis that nitrogen doses significantly boosted abaxial stomata width, abaxial stomata length, adaxial stomata width, adaxial stomata length, epidermal cell, stomata density, stomata index and stomata density was confirmed in this study. Significant increases were obtained with nitrogen doses in flag leaf area, which plays a role in photosynthetic efficiency. Yields were higher in varieties with denser stomata, while yields were lower in varieties with less dense stomata. More detailed studies should be conducted based on the results of this study to gain a deeper understanding of the relationships between stomatal densities and N fertilization, and thus yield increase.

Supplemental Information

All measurements.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18792/supp-1
2 Citations   Views   Downloads