Estimating ankle joint angle from skeletal geometry: a mechanical model of the calcaneal lever in terrestrial mammals

View article
Zoological Science

Introduction

The hindlimbs perform some essential functions for terrestrial life, such as supporting body mass, generating propulsion, and lifting the body. During walking, in particular, the hindlimbs contribute to forming an inverted pendulum (Cavagna, Heglund & Taylor, 1977; Alexander & Jayes, 1978a, 1978b; Hildebrand, 1984; Hildebrand & Hurley, 1985; Alexander, 1991; Griffin, Main & Farley, 2004) or spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) model (Geyer, Seyfarth & Blickhan, 2006), both of which facilitate efficient locomotion by generating propulsive energy. The SLIP model proposes that the limbs act as springs, while also emphasizing the importance of optimized stiffness (Blickhan & Full, 1993; Geyer, Seyfarth & Blickhan, 2006). In these models, the rod of the inverted pendulum is defined as the line between the grounding point of the metatarsus and the center of mass (Cavagna, Heglund & Taylor, 1977; Alexander & Jayes, 1978a, 1978b; Blickhan & Full, 1993; Griffin, Main & Farley, 2004; Geyer, Seyfarth & Blickhan, 2006); therefore, the rod length is governed by the joint angles, particularly those of the knee joint and the ankle joint in the hindlimbs. The previous studies showed that the knee joint angles among mammalian species do not change drastically—remain relatively constant with small changes—during the stance phase, and differ between species (Manter, 1938; Gray, 1944; Goslow, Reinking & Stuart, 1973; Goslow et al., 1981; Alexander & Jayes, 1983; Inuzuka, 1996; Fischer et al., 2002; McGowan, Baudinette & Biewener, 2005; Dutto et al., 2006; Day & Jayne, 2007; Ren et al., 2008; Patel et al., 2013). The variations in the joint angles contribute to differences in body height, locomotion, and biology between species. However, Mizuno & Kohno (2023) showed that the angle between the line of the action of the musculus semimembranosus and the tibia resembles across mammals, even when these taxa belong to different orders. Similarly, Fujiwara (2009) and Fujiwara & Hutchinson (2012) showed that the angle between the olecranon process and the m. triceps brachii remains similar despite differences in the elbow joint angle typically measured between the humerus and ulna. These studies indicate that while joint angles observable from outside the body vary across species, may be conserved across mammals due to skeletal morphology. Therefore, identifying the mechanisms that determine such skeletal angles enables the reconstruction of limb postures in extinct animals, whose joint angles cannot be directly observed.

The foot is a part of the inverted pendulum of the entire hindlimb, and also functions as a lever system driven by extensor muscles to generate greater ground reaction force (Gregory, 1912; Manter, 1938; Biewener, 1989, 1990; McGowan, Baudinette & Biewener, 2005; Deforth et al., 2019). The upward rotation of the calcaneal tuber, caused by contraction of these muscles, induces the downward rotation of the metatarsus, thereby generating ground reaction force. Anatomically, the extensor muscles—specifically the m. gastrocnemius, m. soleus, and m. flexor digitorum superficialis—contribute to raising the calcaneal tuber. These extensor muscles form the tendo calcaneus (Achilles tendon), although the m. soleus is absent or weakened in some taxa. This muscle originates from the flexor side of the knee joint—specifically, the distal femur and the proximal tibia and fibula—and inserts into the distal end of the calcaneal tuber via the Achilles tendon, running nearly parallel to the tibia (Kato & Yamauchi, 2003; König, Liebich & Bragulla, 2007). Therefore, the net force vector produced by the extensor muscles can be assumed to run parallel to the axis of the tibia. The functional role of the ankle extensors during the stance phase to support body mass and generate propulsive force against gravity has been well established (Engberg & Lundberg, 1969; Goslow, Reinking & Stuart, 1973; Rasmussen, Chan & Goslow, 1978; Walmsley, Hodgson & Burke, 1978; Goslow et al., 1981; Nicolopoulos-Stournaras & Iles, 1984; Whelan, Hiebert & Pearson, 1995). In terrestrial mammals, particularly in unguligrade and digitigrade species, the ankle joint is actively extended to counteract gravitational flexion forces during both standing and stance phase. Accordingly, an extensor torque must be generated at the ankle joint, with the calcaneal tuber playing a central role in its propagation. This extensor torque arises from the force applied via the calcaneal tuber and the internal moment arm, defined as the perpendicular distance between the joint’s center of rotation and the line of action of the muscle force (Fujiwara, 2009). Given this biomechanical context, it is reasonable to hypothesize that mammals adopt joint angles that maximize this moment arm during the stance phase, thereby enhancing mechanical advantage and stability.

We hypothesize that (i) the functional ankle extension angle (FAEA), defined as the angle between the line of action of the extensor muscles and calcaneal tuber, is maintained within a range that optimizes muscle force production and mechanical advantage during the stance phase of walking in terrestrial mammals; (ii) FAEA is similar among species with different observable ankle joint angle (θ) which is typically measured; and (iii) θ can be estimated from a mechanical model of the ankle extensor apparatus. This study aims to test these hypotheses using a mechanical model based on the skeletal geometry of each target species, and to provide insight into the fundamental constraints shaping limb posture, which may aid in the functional interpretation of extinct taxa.

Materials and Methods

Mechanical model

To examine the hypotheses, we constructed a simplified mechanical model of joint rotation. For instance, the trochlea of the talus was approximated as a circular arc, and the articulations between the foot bones were assumed to be rigid. This simplification was necessary to allow general comparison across species, as skeletal morphology varies not only between species but also among individuals. Assuming the foot as a simple body of rotation about the ankle joint (Fig. 1) during extension and flexion, the ankle extensor torque ( τ) is generated by the extensor muscles, which inserts at the most distal point on the calcaneus (C) (Fig. 1). τ can be expressed by the following equation:

τ=l×Fwhere F is a contractile force of the extensor muscles, and l is the moment arm length. The moment arm l is defined as the perpendicular distance from the center of the ankle joint rotation (O) to the line of action of F (Fig. 1). If F is constant, τ is directly proportional to l. The moment arm l can be calculated using the following equation:

l=OCsinαwhere OC is the distance between O and C, and α represents the value of FAEA. Since the length OC is fixed for a given specimen, the value of l depends entirely on the angle α (Fig. 1). The function sin α reaches its maximum when α is 90° (Fig. 1). Therefore, l is maximized (sin α = 1) when the line OC is perpendicular to the tibia and vector F. The value of sin α can thus be regarded as the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever.

Mechanical models of the ankle extensor apparatus.

Figure 1: Mechanical models of the ankle extensor apparatus.

Three models show (I) a < 90°, (II) a = 90°, and (III) a > 90°. Each yellow arc represents the ankle joint angle (θ) between the tibia and foot. Each blue arc represents the angle (a) between the line of action of the extensor muscle (F) and the line connecting the center of the ankle joint rotation (O) to the most distal point on the calcaneus (C). Each red dashed line represents the moment arm (l). θ at position (II) is defined as θest. Abbreviations: ca, calcaneus; mt, metatarsus III; and ta, talus.

Assuming that the F runs parallel to the shaft of the tibia and that the articulations between the tarsal and metatarsal bones are rigid, we defined the estimated ankle joint angle (θest) as the angle at which α = 90° (Fig. 1). At this angle, the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever (sin α) is maximized. The mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever decreases when the ankle joint angle θ deviates above or below this value θest. To investigate the directional relationship between the tibia and the Achilles tendon, anatomical observations were performed on several cadaveric specimens. Details of these observations are provided below. All angles (e.g., θ and α) are expressed in degrees unless otherwise noted. θ varies depending on the specimen (Fig. 2).

An example image used to collect ankle joint angle data from living individuals.

Figure 2: An example image used to collect ankle joint angle data from living individuals.

The red dashed line represents the Achilles tendon, while the red solid line indicates the tibial shaft, which runs parallel to the Achilles tendon. The blue solid line shows the dorsal margin of the third metatarsal (metatarsus III). The yellow fan illustrates the ankle joint angle (θobs) being measured.

Dissection

We dissected cadavers donated to the National Museum of Nature and Science (NMNS) by zoos to confirm that the Achilles tendon runs parallel to the tibia, and that the orientation is consistent across different species. The species dissected belong to seven orders, 23 genera, and 24 species (Table 1). All individuals were adults. We followed the ethical guidelines of the NMNS during the dissection.

Table 1:
A list of dissected species by first author.
Species Location
Artiodactyla
Bos taurus NMNS
Capricornis crispus NMNS
Cervus nippon yakusimae NMNS
Elaphurus davidianus NMNS
Giraffa camelopardalis NMNS
Rangifer tarandus NMNS
Perissodactyla
Equus caballus (pony) NMNS
Equus zebra NMNS
Tapirus terrestris KPM
Carnivora
Aonyx cinerea NMNS
Acinonyx jubatus NMNS
Canis lupus familialis NMNS
Chrysocyon brachyurus NMNS
Panthera leo NMNS
Suricata suricatta NMNS
Vulpes vulpes NU
Primates
Cercopithecus neglectus NMNS
Erythrocebus patas NMNS
Macaca fuscata NMNS
Rodentia
Castor canadensis NMNS
Dolichotis patagonum NMNS
Galea musteloides NMNS
Diprotodontia
Petrogale xanthopus NMNS
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-1

Note:

Abbreviations: NMNS, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan; KPM, Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara, Japan; NU is Japan University, Nagoya, Japan.

Collection from living individuals

We defined the ankle joint (θobs) as the angle between the tibia and the metatarsus III of living individuals. Data were collected from 26 extant species, including two domestic breeds (Kiso Horse and thoroughbred) within Equus caballus. Thus, the total number of species was 26, representing 25 genera and 16 families across nine orders (Table 2). These species were selected to cover a wide range of taxa, body masses (i.e., from 0.06 kg for the Mongolian gerbil to 3,400 kg for white rhinoceros), and locomotor mode (unguligrade, digitigrade, plantigrade, and pentapedal) (Table 2). Pentapedal locomotion refers to the mode used by kangaroos (O’Connor et al., 2014). Most target animals are kept in zoos at Higashi Park Zoological Gardens (Aichi, Japan), Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Garden (Aichi, Japan), Hitachi Kamine Zoo (Ibaraki, Japan), Toyohashi Zoo and Botanical Park (Aichi, Japan), and Ueno Zoological Gardens (Tokyo, Japan), and all observations were conducted with official permissions from these facilities. Mongolian gerbils and a cat were kept by a colleague of the authors, and the thoroughbred was hosed at the equestrian arts club of Tsukuba University Equestrian Team (University of Tsukuba). No individuals showed significant pathologies or malformations. Furthermore, we avoided using juvenile individuals.

Table 2:
List of the studied species, with the number of the steps used for the analysis, the locations where the data of the steps were collected, number of the skeletal specimens used for the measurements, and the list of the specimens.
Order, Family Species (common name) Steps [n] Locality or reference Skeletons [n] Specimen
Artiodactyla
Bovidae
Ammotragus lervia
(Barbary sheep)
2 UZ 1 NMNS M42950
Capra hircus
(goat)
4 Co1 1 KPM NF-1004771
Capricornis crispus
(Japanese serow)
2 HZBG 3 NMNS M34472;
NMNS M35895;
TMNH MA304
Cervidae
Cervus nippon yesoensis
(Yezo shika deer)
2 UZ 1 NMNS M39257
Rangifer tarandus
(reindeer)
2 HZBG 2 NMNS M31343;
NMNS M34433
Giraffidae
Giraffa reticulata
(reticulated giraffe)
9 UZ 3 NMNS M33232;
NMNS M34445;
NMNS M47162
Hippopotamidae
Choeropsis liberiensis
(pygmy hippopotamus)
3 UZ 1 NMNS M36955
Perissodactyla
Equidae
Equus caballus
(Kiso horse)
3 TZBP 1 NMNS M31212
Equus caballus
(thoroughbred)
3 TET 2 NMNS M75179;
NMNS M77948
Rhinocerotidae
Ceratotherium simum
(white rhinoceros)
2 TZBP;
Day & Jayne (2007)
3 NMNS M31319;
NMNS M31455;
NMNS M37727
Rhinoceros unicornis
(Indian rhinoceros)
5 HZBG 1 KPM NF1002747
Tapiridae
Tapirus terrestris
(South American tapir)
2 HZBG 2 NMNS M31505;
OMNH unnumbered
Carnivora
Canidae
Canis lupus
(wolf)
4 HZBG 2 NMNS M43287;
OMNH M440
Chrysocyon brachyurus
(maned wolf)
3 UZ 2 NMNS M36655;
NMNS M53024
Felidae
Acinonyx jubatus
(cheetah)
(125) Day & Jayne (2007) 2 NMNS M31465:
NMNS M37279
Felis silvestris catus
(cat)
3 Co1 3 NMNS M36028;
NMNS M36030;
NMNS M76763
Panthera leo
(lion)
6 (119) TZBP; Day & Jayne (2007) 3 NMNS M37728;
NMNS M42648;
NMNS M43347
Panthera tigris
(Sumatran tiger)
3 (125) HZBG; Day & Jayne (2007) 4 NMNS M38483;
NMNS M38486;
OMNH M2401;
TMNH MA318
Herpestidae
Suricata suricatta
(meerkat)
3 HZBG 2 NMNS 33399;
NMNS M54629
Primates
Cercopithecidae
Cercopithecus neglectus
(De Brazza’s monkey)
2 UZ 2 NMNS M71712;
NMNS M75202
Macaca fuscata
(Japanese macaque)
3 KZ 3 NMNS M36028;
NMNS M36074;
NMNS M63048
Rodentia
Caviidae
Dolichotis patagonum
(Patagonian mara)
2 HPZG 3 NMNS M35595;
NMNS M35760;
NMNS M35880
Galea musteloides
(yellow-toothed cavy)
(73) Fischer et al. (2002) 1 NMNS M36015
Muridae
Meriones unguiculatus
(Mongolian gerbil)
2 Co2 1 NMNS M11702
Scandentia
Tupaiidae
Tupaia glis
(common tree shrew)
(84) Fischer et al. (2002) 1 NMNS M28531
Diprotodontia
Macropodidae
Macropus fuliginosus
(western grey kangaroo)
1 HZBG 1 NMNS M43349
Macropus giganteus
(eastern grey kangaroo)
3 UZ 1 NMNS M43210
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-2

Note:

Abbreviations for the locality: Co1 and 2, colleagues who keep the animal; HZBG, Higashiyama Zoo and Botanical Garden, Nagoya, Japan; KZ, Hitachi Kamine Zoo, Hitachi, Japan; TET, Tsukuba University Equestrian Team, Tsukuba, Japan; TZBP, Toyohashi Zoo and Botanical Park, Toyohashi, Japan; UZ, Ueno Zoological Garden, Tokyo, Japan.

Abbreviations for the museums: NMNS, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan; KPM, Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara, Japan; OMNH, Osaka Museum of Natural History, Osaka, Japan.

High-speed video recordings (420 fps) were obtained using a Casio EX-FH20 digital camera (Japan) mounted on a tripod positioned along public viewing paths. The distance between the camera and the targets varied depending on the exhibition/cage layout. All videos were taken from the lateral side and at nearly the same level as each target animal when they walked voluntarily in a straight line without stopping, turning, or changing speed, and perpendicular to the camera on flat ground. No external stimuli (handlers, markers, and confinement) were applied, and recordings were made passively. Kangaroos were recorded while pentapedal locomotion, which use four legs and a tail, rather than hopping. Some data were cited from previous studies (Table 2).

We defined one stance phase, from touch-down to take-off, as one step during stance phase. Each step was screen-captured from the videos using GOM player (Gretech Corporation, Seoul, South Korea). The captured images of each step were divided into five equal time intervals to yield six images per stance phase. On each of the six images, two lines were drawn using Inkscape (ver. 1.2, Inkscape Project), and the angle between them was measured: one line extended from the ankle joint and the proximal end of the tibia, parallel to the Achilles tendon, and the other line along the dorsal margin of the metatarsus III (Fig. 2). We used three or more steps for 13 species, two steps for nine species, and one step for one species, from videos. In addition, five species were cited from previous studies including three species for which both our video data and previous studies were used (Table 2). The mean of the measured angles was defined as θobs.

Collection from skeletal specimens

The ankle joint angles at which the extensor moment arm is maximized were measured using skeletal specimens. The data were collected for the same 26 species used in the observations of θobs (Table 2). Disarticulated hindlimb bones stored at the National Museum of Nature and Science (NMNS: Tsukuba, Japan), Toyohashi Museum of Natural History (Toyohashi, Japan), Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History (Odawara, Japan), and Osaka Museum of Natural History (Osaka, Japan) (Table 2) were used. A total of 42 skeletal specimens were measured. No specimens showed significant pathologies or malformations. Furthermore, we avoided using juvenile specimens.

We reassembled the metatarsals and tarsal bones (calcaneus, talus, cuneiforms, navicular, and cuboid) using a soft, reusable adhesive (Hittsukimushi, Kokuyo, Osaka, Japan), and then the flexibility of the joint connections was confirmed to be negligibly small. The Mongolian gerbil foot skeleton was stored with the bones connected by tendons and ligaments. The reassembled bones were photographed in lateral view using a digital camera (D3400; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Two lines were then drawn on each image, and the angle between them was measured following procedure described below. First, a circle centered at O, which best fits the ridge of the trochlea of the talus, was drawn. Next, a perpendicular line (line A) to the line segment OC, originating from point O, was drawn. Following this, a line connecting the dorsal tips of the proximal and distal epiphyses on the metatarsal III (line B) was drawn (see description in Mechanical Model section). Finally, the angle between lines A and B was defined as the ankle joint angle where the extensor moment arm maximized for the specimen (Fig. 3). These figures were also created using Inkscape. The average of the angles for each species was defined as θest.

An example of the picture for measuring the ankle joint angle data from the skeletal specimens using a cat (M36028).

Figure 3: An example of the picture for measuring the ankle joint angle data from the skeletal specimens using a cat (M36028).

The foot element in connection (tarsal and metatarsal bones) is photographed from the medial view. Point O represents the center of a circle that best fits the edge of the trochlea of the talus. Point C indicates the contact point on the calcaneus when the concentric circle reaches its maximum size. Line A connects the dorsal edges of the proximal and distal epiphyses of metatarsal III. Line B is drawn perpendicular to the line segment OC, originating from point O. The yellow fan represents the measured ankle joint angle (θest). Abbreviations: ca, calcaneus; mt, metatarsus III; and ta, talus. The scale bar is 10 mm. This foot was rearticurated and taken by the author at NMNS.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, body mass (in grams) was transformed using natural logarithmic scale (ln). The locomotor mode was classified into four groups: plantigrade, digitigrade, unguligrade, and pentapedal (Table 2). Phylogenetic Comparative Methods (PCMs) were applied to all measurements and derived variables. Pairwise comparisons were conducted following the phylogenetic ANOVA (phyANOVA) using phylogenetic t-tests with Holm’s correction for multiple testing to determine which pairs had significant differences (Garland et al., 1993; Revell, 2012). Additionally, the correlation coefficient between θobs and θest was calculated.

Phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) analyses were performed to examine the following relationships: (1) mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever and locomotor mode; (2) mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever and body mass; and (3) body mass, θobs and θest. The phylogenetic tree used for these analyses was constructed using Timetree: The Timescale of Life (https://timetree.org/).

All statistical analyses were performed using the R software package (ver. 4.4.1, R Core Team, 2024).

Results

The directions of the Achilles tendon and the tibia were nearly parallel in the species dissected in this study (Fig. 4). This parallel orientation of the Achilles tendon relative to the tibia was consistently observed over a wide range of joint angles. Therefore, the direction of the line of action of the ankle joint extensor muscle can be approximated by the tibia. Additionally, the transitions of the ankle joint angle during the stance phase were checked to ensure the θobs represented the angle of the target species. According to the line graph of the ankle joint angle transitions, these were gradual and the maximum differences between the average angle (θobs) and the maximum or minimum angle were small in the many studied species (Fig. 5): in 22 species of the 27 studied species, the maximum differences were less than 20 degrees. Thus, θobs was considered representative for each species and was suitable for comparison with θest. The Mongolian gerbil which had the smallest body mass, 0.06 kg, had both the minimum θobs and θest (64° and 95°, respectively). The white rhinoceros, which has the largest body mass, 3,400 kg, had the second maximum θest (141°). Thoroughbred, with the fourth largest body mass (518 kg), had the maximum θobs (157°), whereas the maximum θest was 146° for the Indian rhinoceros, which had the second largest body mass (2,100 kg) (Table 3). The Japanese serow, reindeer, and Japanese macaque had the smallest absolute difference between θest and θobs (0°), and the thoroughbred had the largest difference, 38° (Table 3).

Some examples of the hind limbs dissected by first author.

Figure 4: Some examples of the hind limbs dissected by first author.

(A) Cervus nippon yakusimae; (B) Macaca fuscata; (C) Panthera leo; (D) Equus caballus (pony). Solid lines show the Achilles tendon, and broken lines showed the shaft of the tibia. Note that these lines run nearly parallel with each other. The author performed the dissections and took these photos at NMNS.
A line graph of the angle transition of target animals.

Figure 5: A line graph of the angle transition of target animals.

X-axis shows the number of the measured selected frames between the beginning and the end of the stance phase. Y-axis shows the ankle joint angle. The averages of these angles were defined as θobs [°] for each species. Each color shows the taxonomic group (order) of the target animals and the representation of each color in the legend.
Table 3:
The values of the observed ankle joint angle (θobs), estimated ankle joint angle (θest), efficiency of the calcaneal lever of the ankle joint extensor (sin α), body mass, and locomotor mode of the studied species.
Order Family Species θobs (°) θest (°) sin α Body mass (kg) Locomotor mode
Artiodactyla Bovidae Ammotragus lervia 142 130 0.98 64 U
Capra hircus 130 137 0.99 20 U
Japanese serow 127 127 1.00 38 U
Cervidae Capricornis priscus 126 123 0.99 75 U
Rangifer tarandus 122 121 1 120 U
Giraffidae Giraffa reticulata 146 140 0.99 1,000 U
Hippopotamidae Choeropsis liberiensis 124 117 0.99 223 U
Perissodactyla Equidae Equus caballus: Kiso horse 144 125 0.95 400 U
Equus caballus: thoroughbred 157 119 0.79 518 U
Rhinocerotidae Ceratotherium simum 149 141 0.99 3,400 U
Rhinoceros unicornis 145 146 1.00 2,100 U
Tapiridae Tapirus terrestris 131 102 0.87 200 U
Carnivora Canidae Canis lupus 130 119 0.98 40 D
Chrysocyon brachyurus 133 124 0.98 24 D
Felidae Acinonyx jubatus 125 112 0.97 48 D
Felis silvestris catus 112 109 0.99 4.8 D
Panthera tigris 125 114 0.98 125 D
Panthera leo 120 108 0.98 188 D
Herpestidae Suricata suricatta 108 121 0.98 0.7 D
Primates Cercopithecidae Cercopithecus neglectus 99 108 0.99 4.5 P
Macaca fuscata 109 109 1.00 16 P
Rodentia Caviidae Dolichotis patagonum 99 111 0.98 8 D
Galea musteloides 75 106 0.86 0.34 P
Muridae Meriones unguiculatus 66 95 0.88 0.06 P
Scandentia Tupaiidae Tupaia glis 84 107 0.92 0.18 P
Diprotodontia Macropodidae Macropus fuliginosus 96 119 0.92 43.5 Pe
Macropus giganteus 101 122 0.93 41 Pe
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-3

Note:

Abbreviations for the locomotor modes: D, digitigrade; P, plantigrade; Pe, pentadactyl; U, unguligrade.

In 24 species (including the Kiso horse), the value of the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever exceeded 0.9; among these, 18 species had values greater than 0.95. Three species had the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever between 0.8 and 0.9. The thoroughbred had the lowest mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever at 0.79 (Table 3 and Fig. 6). PhyANOVA and pairwise comparisons were conducted to assess significant differences in the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever among locomotor modes. The phyANOVA showed no significant differences (p = 0.602), and all pairwise Holm-adjusted p-values were equal to 1.00; therefore no significant differences in the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever among locomotor modes (Table 4). Additional phyANOVA and pairwise comparisons were also conducted among orders. However, since Scandentia was represented by only one species, it was excluded from the analysis. The phyANOVA among orders also showed no significant differences (p = 0.665), and all pairwise Holm-adjusted p-values were equal to 1.00 (Table 4). Thus, neither locomotor mode nor order showed significant differences in the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever.

Relationship between the efficiency of the calcaneus lever (sin a) during the stance phase in the studied species.

Figure 6: Relationship between the efficiency of the calcaneus lever (sin a) during the stance phase in the studied species.

X-axis shows the body mass in log10. Y-axis shows the value of sin α. See legends for the taxonomic group (order) of the target animals (color-code) and the locomotor mode (symbol shape).
Table 4:
Results of phyANOVA for the relationships between locomotor modes and the efficiency of the calcaneal lever of the ankle joint extensor (sin α), and between taxonomic order and sin α.
PhyANOVA (Locomotor mode vs. sin α)
Sum Sq Mean Sq F value p-value
Locomotor mode 0.0143 0.0048 3.4994 0.618
Residual 0.0299 0.0014
Pairwise posthoc test
Comparison Adjust p-value
Digitigrade vs. Unguligrade 1
Digitigrade vs. Plantigrade 1
Digitigrade vs. Pentapedal 1
Unguligrade vs. Plantigrade 1
Unguligrade vs. Pentapedal 1
Plantigrade vs. Pentapedal 1
PhyANOVA (Order vs. sin α)
Sum Sq Mean Sq F value p-value
Order 0.0240 0.0048 5.068 0.661
Residual 0.0180 0.0009
Pairwise posthoc test
Comparison Adjust p-value
Artiodactyla vs. Perissodactyla 1
Artiodactyla vs. Carnivora 1
Artiodactyla vs. Primates 1
Artiodactyla vs. Rodentia 1
Artiodactyla vs. Diprotodontia 1
Perissodactyla vs. Carnivora 1
Perissodactyla vs. Primates 1
Perissodactyla vs. Rodentia 1
Perissodactyla vs. Diprotodontia 1
Carnivora vs. Primates 1
Carnivora vs. Rodentia 1
Carnivora vs. Diprotodontia 1
Primates vs. Rodentia 1
Primates vs. Diprotodontia 1
Rodentia vs. Diprotodontia 1
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-4

Since the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever was not normally distributed, the Spearman’s rank order correlation was used to assess the correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient between the θobs and the θest was 0.75, with the p-value less than 0.05 (p = 1.21 × 10−5: Table 4 and Fig. 7). This indicated a strong positive correlation between θobs and θest, and supporting a significant correlation in the population.

Relationship between the observed angle (θobs) and the estimated angle (θest) in studied species.

Figure 7: Relationship between the observed angle (θobs) and the estimated angle (θest) in studied species.

X-axis shows the estimated angle (θest). Y-axis shows the observed angle (θobs). The gray area shows the lever of the ankle joint exerts more than 90%. See legends for the taxonomic group (order) of the target animals (color-code) and the locomotor mode (symbol shape).

We also performed multiple linear regression analysis via PGLS using three data sets: (1) Kiso horse data representing horse; (2) thoroughbred data representing horse; and (3) excluding horse to examine the relationships between θobs, θest, and body mass. This approach was taken because the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever values differed notably between the Kiso horse and the thoroughbred, even though they belong to same species (Table 3). The regression equation for the θobs can be expressed as:

θobs=β0+β1θest+β2bodymass

In the Kiso horse data set, the regression coefficients were β0 = 4.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) [−34.25 to 43.05], intercept), β1 = 0.48 (95% CI [0.12–0.83], coefficient for θest, p = 0.009), and β2 = 4.87 (95% CI [3.10–6.25], coefficient for body mass, p = 2.9 × 10−6), with a significant overall model (p = 6.1 × 10−8, adjusted R2 = 0.74) (Table 5). In the Thoroughbred data set, the coefficients were β0 = 8.42 (95% CI [−37.85 to 54.69]), β1 = 0.43 (95% CI [0.03–0.83], p = 0.032), and β2 = 4.87 (95% CI [3.07–6.67], p = 8.7 × 10−6) (overall model p = 6.7 × 10−7, adjusted R2 = 0.68) (Table 5). In the data set excluding Equus caballus, the coefficients were β0 = 5.46 (95% CI [−33.30 to 44.22]), β1 = 0.47 (95% CI [0.12–0.82], p = 0.009), and β2 = 4.61 (95% CI [2.97–6.25], p = 4.0 × 10−6) (overall model p = 9.5 × 10−8, adjusted R2 = 0.75) (Table 5). Pagel’s λ values indicated a strong phylogenetic signal across all data sets (0.943, 0.977, and 0.938, respectively) (Table 5).

Table 5:
Results of PGLS of observed ankle joint angle (θobs) as a function of estimated ankle joint angle (θest) and body mass (ln).
PGLS of θobs as a function of θest and body mass (ln)
Dataset Predictor Estimate Std. Error t value p value Pagel’s λ
Kiso horse Intercept 4.90 18.94 0.26 0.798 0.943
θest 0.48 0.17 2.84 0.009
Body mass 4.87 0.76 6.14 2.89 × 10−6
Thoroughbred Intercept 8.42 21.99 0.38 0.705 0.977
θest 0.43 0.19 2.28 0.032
Body mass 4.87 0.86 5.68 8.7 × 10−6
Excluding horse Intercept 5.46 18.75 0.29 0.773 0.938
θest 0.47 0.17 2.85 0.009
Body mass 4.61 0.76 6.08 4.0 × 10−6
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-5

Discussion

A total of 85.2% (23 out of 27) of the studied species showed a mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever greater than 0.9 (sin α > 0.9). This species included individuals with a wide range of body masses, from 0.18 kg (common tree shrew) to 3,400 kg (white rhinoceros), as well as species representing three locomotor modes and six orders (Table 3). The phyANOVA and pairwise comparison tests for mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever across locomotor modes and taxonomic orders detected no significant differences. Additionally, the correlation coefficient between mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever and body mass was not statistically significant (p = 0.12), suggesting that the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever is not strongly influenced by these factors. These results suggest that FAEA of terrestrial mammals is maintained within a range that optimizes mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever during the stance phase under steady-speed walking conditions, across a wide range of body masses and taxa. A higher mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever enhances torque generation at the ankle joint for a given muscle force, contributing to more efficient support and propulsion during walking (Biewener, 1989; Biewener & Roberts, 2000; Ray & Takahashi, 2020). This mechanical advantage is particularly important during the stance phase, when joints must resist gravitational flexion forces.

Based on the multiple linear regression analyses using PGLS, the Kiso horse data set more closely resembled the excluding E. caballus data set (Table 5); therefore, the Kiso horse data set was treated as representative of E. caballus. The regression equation showed that the effect of body mass on θobs is notably stronger than that of θest, where each unit increase in θest leads to an increase in θobs by about 0.48 degrees. Both factors significantly influence θobs, with body mass having a more substantial impact. However, in species exceeding 10 kg in body mass, the recalculated θobs values using the regression equation (hereafter referred to as θr-obs) showed larger differences from θobs than differences of θest values. These mean values were 11.1 and 6.0 degrees, respectively. The θr-obs values showed smaller differences than θest in 11 out of 26 species, but five of these 11 species had a body mass below 10 kg (Mongolian gerbil, common tree shrew, yellow-toothed cavy, meerkat, and cat) (Table 6). Notably, only seven out of the 26 species had a body mass below 10 kg (Table 6). Among the 19 species exceeding 10 kg, three species (pygmy hippopotamus, tiger, and Kiso horse) showed identical differences from the θobs for both θr-obs and θest. In the remaining 16 species, θest showed smaller differences than θr-obs in 11 cases. On average differences of θr-obs were 3.8 degrees in species below 10 kg, and 11.1 degrees in species exceeding 10 kg. In contrast, the differences in θest were −16.3 degrees in species below 10 kg, and 6.0 degrees in species exceeding 10 kg (Table 6). In addition, the correlation coefficient between the θobs and the θest was significantly positive and strong (r = 0.74). Therefore, θest can be reliably used to reconstruct θobs in species exceeding 10 kg, even if the skeletal specimens have been stored disarticulated.

Table 6:
The ln of body mass (BM), mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever (sin α), observed (θobs) and estimated (θest) ankle joint angles, the difference between θobs and θest (θ[sub]).
Species ln BM sin α (mechanical advantage) θobs θest θobsθest θr-obs θobsθr-obs
Meriones unguiculatus 4.1 0.87 66 95 −29 69 −3
Tupaia glis 5.2 0.92 84 107 −23 80 4
Galea musteloides 5.8 0.86 75 106 −31 83 −8
Suricata suricatta 6.6 0.99 108 121 −13 93 15
Cercopithecus neglectus 8.4 0.99 99 108 −9 96 3
Felis silvestris catus 8.5 1.00 112 109 3 96 16
Dolichotis patagonum 9.0 0.98 99 111 −12 100 −1
Macaca fuscata 9.7 1.00 109 111 −2 103 6
Capra hircus 9.9 0.99 130 137 −7 116 14
Chrysocyon brachyurus 10.1 0.99 133 124 9 111 22
Canis lupus 10.5 0.98 130 119 11 111 19
Capricornis crispus 10.6 1.00 127 127 0 115 12
Macropus fuliginosus 10.6 0.92 96 119 −23 111 −15
Macropus giganteus 10.7 0.93 101. 122 −21 113 −12
Acinonyx jubatus 10.8 0.97 125 112 13 109 16
Ammotragus lervia 11.1 0.98 142 130 12 118 24
Cervus nippon yesoensis 11.2 1.00 126 123 3 116 10
Panthera tigris 11.7 0.98 125 114 11 114 11
Rangifer tarandus 11.7 1.00 121 122 −1 118 3
Choeropsis liberiensis 12.1 0.99 124 117 7 117 7
Panthera leo 12.2 0.98 120 108 12 113 7
Tapirus terrestris 12.3 0.88 131 103 28 111 20
Equus caballus: Kiso horse 12.9 0.95 144 125 19 125 19
Equus caballus: thoroughbred 13.2 0.79 157 119 38 123 34
Giraffa reticulata 13.8 0.99 146 140 6 136 10
Rhinoceros unicornis 14.6 1.00 145 146 −1 142 3
Ceratotherium simum 15.0 0.99 149 141 8 142 7
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/table-6

Notably, kangaroos (Macropus spp.) showed negative values for θobs minus θest (−23 and −21, respectively) (Table 6), indicating that the θobs were more flexed than the θest. Kangaroos employ a unique form of locomotion known as pentapedal, which uses the tail to support body mass during quadrupedal walking (Windsor & Dagg, 1971; O’Connor et al., 2014). However, because the tail is used during the swing phase of the hindlimbs, other factors may contribute to this result. One possible explanation is that quadrupedal walking is not the typical mode of locomotion for them; they primarily use hopping as their main mode of locomotion. The hopping gait is most commonly employed during regular movement, escape responses, and long-distance travel (Windsor & Dagg, 1971; O’Connor et al., 2014). Their hindlimbs are highly specialized for hopping, e.g., elongated metatarsals and shortened forelimbs (Alexander & Vernon, 1975; Polly, 2007; McGowan & Collins, 2018; Jones, Travouillon & Janis, 2024). The elongated metatarsals of hopping species increase the distance between the ground and the ankle joint, whereas short forelimbs reduce the distance between the ground and the trunk. It is possible that flexion of the hindlimb joints during quadrupedal walking, as observed in this study, serves to lower the posterior trunk, which might partly account for the more flexed θobs relative to θest in kangaroos. However, because this study includes two kangaroos species, additional data from other hopping species such as wallaby and kangaroo rat are needed to confirm the idea.

The data from two breeds of horses, the Kiso horse and the thoroughbred, implied that artificial selection had influenced on their morphology. These two breeds are classified in the same species, Equus caballus (horse), but their sin α differed by 0.16, with the Kiso horse showing higher value (0.95) than the Thoroughbred (0.75) (Table 3). This difference was greater than between the highest and the second lowest sin α of this study, 0.13 (Table 3). This difference appeared to result from more extended hindlimb posture in thoroughbred, where θobs exceeded θest, reducing the mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever. While both breeds are domesticated, their morphology reflects fundamentally different breeding purposes. The Kiso horse is a medium-sized Japanese native horse that had been raised since around fifth century and used for agriculture and transportation in mountain regions until the middle of the 20th century (Nakagawa, 2014; Yamashita, 2014). Today, it is maintained primarily for conservation. In addition, the Japanese native horses have remained independent from modern breeding (Nozawa, 1992). Thoroughbred, on the other hand, was developed in the late 18th century and has been strongly selected for racing abilities and characteristics until today (Cunningham, 1991; Bower et al., 2012). It is possible that artificial selection for enhanced galloping ability in Thoroughbreds has favored morphologies that maximize propulsion during high-speed locomotion. This may include joint configurations that enhance the rotational torque around the ankle joint (Gnagey, Clayton & Lanovaz, 2006). Additionally, efficient elastic energy storage requires significant tendon stretch, which is facilitated by joint flexion (Dimery, Alexander & Ker, 1986; Biewener, 1998). Therefore, more extended posture during walking of thoroughbred may reflect an adaptation for maximize both elastic energy recovery and mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever during running. However, this study had only two breeds of horses because we aimed to collect data from wide range of taxa. To test this idea, it will be necessary to collect data from broad range of species and breeds within Equidae.

There were some possibilities to lead errors in this study. In vivo measurement was limited by animal behavior and shooting environment. In addition, the measurements were not performed with any markers directly put on the living specimens. When measuring skeletal specimens, although the articulation flexibility is small, thickness of the adhesive material could cause errors, and the effect of measurement tools accuracy also coursed errors. The ideas to avoid these errors, such as using motion capture, making a strait walkway for recording video, and taking video with x-ray cinematography. Furthermore, no speed-related parameters, such as actual velocity, Froude number, or duty factor, were measured in this study. Although all animals were observed walking at self-selected speeds, variation in walking velocity among species may have affected joint postures. Therefore, the lack of speed standardization represents a limitation when comparing θobs values across taxa. Future studies may benefit from quantifying stride parameters to better control for interspecific variation in locomotor dynamics.

Conclusion

In this study, we proposed a mechanical model of the ankle extensor apparatus of terrestrial mammals that approximates the ankle joint as a simple hinge and the force of the ankle extensors as acting parallel to the tibia. Our model predicts an estimated joint angle (θest) at which the moment arm of the ankle extensors is maximized. By comparing this predicted angle with observed ankle joint angles (θobs) during walking, we found that despite large variations in θobs among species, mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever (sin a) remains within a relatively narrow range, supporting the notion that, across taxa, skeletal morphology at the ankle joint has been selected for optimization of mechanical advantage of the calcaneal lever for the ankle plantar flexors. This hypothesis is supported even in species with varying ankle joint postures and ranges of motion. This insight provides a new perspective for reconstructing locomotor postures in extinct terrestrial mammals and enhances understanding of the biomechanical constraints shaping limb function.

Supplemental Information

All data of measured angle of walk.

The raw data shows all measurements of bone and angles.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/supp-1

All data of measured angle of skeleton.

The raw data shows all measurements of bone and angles.

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.20056/supp-2