Review History

All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on September 23rd, 2013 and was peer-reviewed by the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on October 13th, 2013.

Version 0.1 (accepted)

· Oct 13, 2013 · Academic Editor

Accept

The original manuscript had been reviewed by three referees. Although some of their original reviews were not very positive, I admit that the authors addressed the raised points faithfully. Overall, I am happy to accept their revised manuscript.

External reviews were received for this submission. These reviews were used by the Editor when they made their decision, and can be downloaded below.
Download external reviews - submitted Sep 23, 2013

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.