PeerJ's recent tweet (https://twitter.com/thePeerJ/status/1079362977265082368) pointed me here.

The BS threshold ranges (upper left in the graphic) are not linked to branch thickness/signatures, can this graphical error be fixed?

Also, it would be helpful to have an explanation in the legend for the signatures used for the morphological traits.

(Figure 3 has the same issues)

In the methods, the authors note that "The time of coleoid divergence from Nautiloidea was fixed at 270 mya (Kroger, Vinther & Fuchs, 2011)", but here, they talk about "calibrating the Octobrachia-Decabrachia divergence at 270 Mya (Kroger, Vinther & Fuchs, 2011)". Those are two different nodes. Based on Kroger et al., 2011, I think the calibrated node was the Decabrachia-Octobrachia divergence (in...