Design of a consumer behavior prediction model integrating reinforcement learning and time series analysis in online e-commerce reviews


Abstract

This study focuses on the design and optimization of consumer behavior prediction models in online e-commerce reviews. To address the issues of slow convergence and insufficient robustness in the traditional Q-Learning reinforcement learning algorithm, this paper introduces a probabilistic action-selection algorithm. This algorithm employs a multi-step iterative mechanism, utilizing instantaneous differencing to enhance the likelihood of selecting high Q-value actions during model iteration, thereby accelerating the solution process and ensuring the robustness of network optimization. Given the nonlinear and high-noise characteristics of consumer behavior time series data in e-commerce reviews, we propose a hybrid intelligent prediction model, QL-ANN-HMM, which effectively reduces the impact of systematic random errors and significantly improves prediction accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved Q-learning algorithm achieves a 2.71% and 5.96% improvement in MAPE and NMSE metrics on the Amazon Reviews 2023 and Flipkart Reviews datasets, respectively, compared to the traditional Q-learning algorithm. Additionally, the QL-ANN-HMM model achieves lower MAE, MAPE, and NMSE values on both datasets, recorded at 0.0195, 0.019, and 0.0189, respectively. This research not only provides novel theoretical support and technical methods for predicting consumer behavior in online e-commerce reviews but also enables e-commerce platforms to more accurately track market dynamics, optimize resource allocation, and achieve sustainable development through the comprehensive analysis of consumer behavioral data.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].