Back to all available

Effect of planting density and harvesting date on yield and quality of Artemisia argyi

agricultural-science
biochemistry
ecology
environmental-sciences
plant-science

Abstract

Background: Field investigations revealed that during the production of Artemisia argyi Lévl . et Vant. excessive planting density and untimely harvesting lead to desiccation and abscission of leaves in the middle and lower plant sections. The height of these withered leaves (dead leaf height) accounted for over 50% of the plant height, significantly reducing both the yield and quality of the medicinal herb A. argyi leaves.

Methods: This study employed field experiments using Nanyang A. argyi as the test material. Agronomic traits (including plant height, canopy width, number of effective leaves on the main stem, dead leaf height, stem diameter, internode length, and yield) and quality indicators (including volatile oil content, moxa yield rate, eucalyptol content, borneol content, and total flavonoid content) were measured under different planting density treatments and at different harvest times.

Results: The results demonstrated that reducing planting density promoted sturdier plant growth, increased the number of effective leaves on the main stem, decreased the dead leaf height, and increased the dry matter ratio of the A. argyi leaves. As the harvest time was delayed, the number of effective leaves on the main stem, dead leaf height, and yield all gradually increased. The volatile oil content, eucalyptol content, and borneol content in A. argyi leaves increased gradually with decreasing planting density. These same components initially increased and then decreased as the harvest time was extended. Conversely, the combustion calorific value of A. argyi down, total flavonoid content, polysaccharide content, and polyphenol content generally decreased gradually with reduced density. The combustion calorific value, total flavonoid content, and polyphenol content also exhibited an initial increase followed by a decrease with prolonged harvest time.

Conclusions: Comprehensive analysis of essential oil content, down yield rate, eucalyptol content, borneol content, dry matter ratio, and yield across different densities and harvest periods indicated that for spring-planted A. argyi, a planting spacing of 20 cm × 40 cm combined with harvesting one week after the Dragon Boat Festival resulted in superior overall quality and higher yield.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].