Novel predictive Nomograms for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and poor neurological function for Patients after the Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a retrospective study


Abstract

Objective: To develop novel models that predict the occurrence of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI) and functional outcomes for patients following acute Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH).

Methods: A total of 195 cases of aSAH were analyzed retrospectively based on hospitalization data from Taian City Central Hospital, covering the period from September 2019 to January 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: the DCI group and the non-DCI group, depending on the occurrence of DCI. Additionally, patients were further classified into the Good outcome group and the Poor outcome group based on modified Rankin scale scores assessed three months post-discharge. We compared baseline characteristics among the different groups, including age, gender, smoking history, alcohol consumption, admission blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale score, Hunt-Hess score, aneurysm location, surgical approach, and laboratory test results. This comparison aimed to identify key variables for subsequent multivariable logistic regression analysis. Ultimately, two novel models were shown in nomograms. The Calibration Curve, Decision Curve Analysis curve, and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve were employed to evaluate the performance of these models.

Results: In the model developed to predict DCI following aSAH, hypertension and Hunt-Hess grade emerged as independent risk factors ( P < 0.05). The model demonstrated an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 79%, with a sensitivity of 85.0% and specificity of 64.5%. In contrast, the model predicting poor functional outcomes after aSAH identified age, Hunt-Hess grade, and ND (neutrophil count × D-dimer levels) as significant influencers on functional outcomes ( P < 0.05). This model achieved an AUC of 83.7%, with a sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 61.0%. The calibration curve indicated a strong alignment between the predicted probabilities and the actual outcomes. Additionally, the DCA curve suggested that early intervention could provide substantial benefits based on our findings.

Conclusions: Two independent predictors of DCI following an aSAH are hypertension and the Hunt-Hess grade. Additionally, age, ND, as well as the Hunt-Hess grade, are independent predictors of functional outcomes. The combined predictive nomograms of these factors are greater than that of any single index.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].