Back to all available

Unraveling proteomic signatures and neuroinflammatory networks in a CCI rat model of early sciatica: insights for neuropathic pain mechanisms

cell-biology
molecular-biology
neuroscience
histology

Abstract

Background. Sciatica is a prevalent and highly debilitating condition that is clinically characterized by pain radiating along the distribution of the sciatic nerve. Despite its common occurrence, the progression of early sciatica remains not yet fully elucidated. This study aims to explore the potential molecular mechanism underlying early-stage sciatica progression.

Methods. A total of 20 rats were collected, with 9 in the control group and 11 rats in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model group. The sciatic nerve tissues of rats were collected at three time points: 1, 3, and 7 days post-surgery. A protein microarray was used to detect the expression levels of 27 cytokines in sciatic nerve tissues at different times. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were used for functional and pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). ELISA was used to detect the levels of chemokine CINC-2 and neurotrophic growth factor CNTF.

Results. A total of 11 proteins showed significant differential expression between the CCI and control groups at all three time points (days 1, 3, and 7) after sciatic nerve injury. Specifically, CINC-2, CINC-3, Fractalkine, LIX, L-Selectin, PDGF-AA, IL-1α, IL-6, TIMP-1, and β-NGF were significantly upregulated (P<0.05), whereas the neurotrophic-related protein ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) was significantly downregulated (P <0.05). KEGG pathway analysis revealed that these DEPs were primarily enriched in key inflammatory signaling pathways, including the JAK-STAT, Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, Chemokine, TNF, NOD-like receptor, and NF-kappa B signaling pathways. GO analysis indicated their involvement in biological processes such as immune response and cellular chemotaxis. Protein function analysis further confirmed the close correlation of these DEPs with cellular recognition and neuroinflammation. Additionally, ELISA validation showed that the key protein CINC-2 was upregulated and CNTF was significantly downregulated in the early CCI group.

Conclusions. The progression of early sciatica is closely associated with neuroinflammation triggered by the overexpression of inflammatory factors and nerve dysfunction mediated by neurotrophic-related proteins.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].