Back to all available

Impact of EV Transplantation on Murine Hematology and Metabolism

molecular-biology
drugs-and-devices
immunology
translational-medicine
metabolic-sciences

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), promising natural nanocarriers, face clinical hurdles like heterogeneity and immunogenicity. This study evaluates the species-specific effects and metabolic impacts of EV transplantation, aiming to explore their therapeutic value. EVs were isolated from rabbit and C57BL/6 mouse via ultracentrifugation, with characterization performed using transmission electron microscopy and nanoparticle tracking analysis. EVs were administered via tail vein injection to C57BL/6 mice and ob/ob mice, followed by longitudinal monitoring of blood biochemical parameters, hematological profiles, and hepatic pathological alterations. qPCR was employed to analyze EV-associated miRNA expression and associated target gene regulatory mechanisms. The study revealed that syngeneic EVs induced transient physiological fluctuations during acute exposure, with no significant alterations in blood parameters after chronic intervention. Xenogeneic EVs triggered elevated alkaline phosphatase and leukocyte imbalance, suggesting immune activation. Healthy donor EVs ameliorated hepatic steatosis in ob/ob mice, coinciding with enriched miR-26-5p levels in donor EVs and recipient livers. This study shows the safety benefits of syngeneic EVs, while noting the immunogenic risks of xenogeneic EV transplantation. Healthy donor EVs significantly reduced hepatic steatosis in obese mice, supporting translation of EV therapies.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.
  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].