Association between 24-hour movement behaviors and the frequency of colds in Chinese middle school students: a compositional and isotemporal substitution analysis


Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) exerts a significant impact on global health and has been associated with a reduced risk of the common cold. This study aims to examine the correlation between physical activity and the frequency of colds among junior high school students in China.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 356 middle school students aged 12—13 in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Twenty-four-hour movement behaviors were measured using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer, and participants reported the number of cold episodes over the past year. Compositional linear regression and isotemporal substitution models were employed to analyze the association between time allocation to 24-hour movement behaviors and the frequency of colds, and to predict changes in frequency of colds following time reallocation among these behaviors.

Results: 1) The time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was the most stable component of 24-hour movement behaviors among middle school students. When activity patterns changed, the highest probability of time reallocation occurred with light physical activity (LPA). 2) A significant association was observed between 24-hour movement behaviors and the frequency of colds among middle school students. Specifically, the proportion of MVPA time was negatively correlated with the frequency of colds among middle school students. The proportion of time spent in sleep (SP) was positively associated with the frequency of colds. No significant associations were observed between time allocation in sedentary behavior (SB) or light physical activity (LPA) and the frequency of colds. 3) The 15-minute isotemporal substitution model predicted significant reductions in the frequency of colds when replacing both sedentary behavior (SB) and sleep (SP) with MVPA. Conversely, when MVPA was replaced by either SB or SP, the frequency of colds increased significantly. Notably, the substitution of SP with MVPA demonstrated the most substantial effect in reducing the frequency of colds. 4) The dose-response relationship (ranging from -30 to +30 minutes) revealed asymmetric effects on the frequency of colds when mutually substituting MVPA with either SB or SP.

Conclusion: The results suggest that schools, students, and parents should prioritize the integrated effects of 24-hour movement behaviors and the moderate transformation of SB and SP to MVPA to reduce the frequency of colds among middle school students.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].