Seed priming with lavender essential oil increases the germination and seedling growth on saline and potentially toxic elements-contaminated soils


Abstract

Background: Seed priming with natural compounds has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance plant tolerance to abiotic stresses. Essential oils may mitigate the adverse consequences of potentially toxic elements (PTE) and salinity on seed germination and early growth. This research aimed to explore the priming effect of different doses of Lavandula angustifolia essential oil on germination and seedling development of three Mediterranean aromatic species: Achillea millefolium, Ocimum basilicum, and Thymus vulgaris. Methods: The priming treatment was evaluated at different concentrations of essential oil (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.8% vs H2O and polysorbate P80 as controls) on two PTE heavy metal-polluted soils from abandoned mining sites (Montevecchio, HM1; Su Suergiu, HM2; Sardinia, Italy), a saline soil from Arborea in Sardinia (Sal) and a sandy control soil. HM1 and HM2 soils were polluted by As, Cd, Pb, Sb and Zn. Results: Soil type, plant species, and priming conditions significantly affected germination rate, seedling vigor index, and fresh weight. Notably, 0.2% essential oil priming increased germination from ~10% in A. millefolium on HM1 to ~17% in T. vulgaris on control soil. A. millefolium and T. vulgaris showed significant higher soil tolerance index in contaminated soils under 0.2% priming, while T. vulgaris further improved it under 0.2–0.8% priming in control soil. Moreover, In Sal soil, germination and seedling development were generally inhibited across all species, yet Lavandula essential oil at 0.2% occasionally alleviated these effects. Conclusions: These findings highlighted the role of essential oil seed priming in enhancing early plant establishment and stress tolerance, supporting the requalification of marginal lands.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].