From data to impact: A multivocal review of success factors and criteria for data science projects


Abstract

Background. Organizations increasingly invest in data science projects for their transformative impact potential, but high failure rates highlight the necessity of effective success management strategies to realize data’s strategic value. This study aims to support such strategies by identifying and synthesizing two key dimensions: critical success factors (CSFs) and success criteria.
Methodology. A multivocal literature review (MLR) of 3,134 academic and grey sources was conducted, from which 57 high-quality publications were synthesized. To improve practical relevance, findings were refined through an expert panel of data science professionals. The CSFs were organized using the P-DOTS (Project, Data, Organization, Technology, Strategy) framework for comprehensive coverage. Success criteria were grouped into six outcome-focused categories and paired with example metrics to support evaluation.
Results. Key CSFs, such as goal setting, team capability, and stakeholder involvement, emerged as universally significant across data science and related domains. Generic factors often hold equal or greater importance than data-specific ones like data quality, access, and governance. Our analysis of success criteria confirms a shift in evaluation focus, from traditional project performance toward criteria such as stakeholder satisfaction, product quality, and value delivered. Overall, this study provides an extensive overview of the current research landscape and expert-validated success dimensions.
Conclusions. This is the first MLR to investigate success dimensions in data science projects, bridging academic and industry perspectives. The identified dimensions provide a practical basis for defining, evaluating, and improving project outcomes and establish the building blocks for success management approaches tailored to data science.
Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ Computer Science does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].