The gut microbiota mediates dietary modulation of mild cognitive impairment in elderly individuals: a cross-sectional study


Abstract

Background: Prospective studies investigating the relationships between dietary factors and cognitive function in elderly Chinese individuals are limited. The role of the gut microbiota in this relationship is unclear. Here, we aimed to explore the role of the gut microbiota in dietary modulation of mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Methods: This study included 48 patients with MCI and 43 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Participant demographics and blood lipid levels were recorded. Dietary habits were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and cognitive function was evaluated with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Faecal samples were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to examine correlations between the gut microbiota and dietary intake, cognitive function, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.

Results: Compared with HCs, subjects with MCI had significantly lower education levels and higher serum total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C levels ( P < 0.05). The MCI group also exhibited significantly reduced consumption of bean curd/tofu pudding, yogurt, freshwater fish, crustaceans (shrimp and crab), pine nuts, and pumpkin ( P < 0.05). Significant enrichment of the genera Desulfovibrio , Sutterella , UCG-003 , norank_f__norank_o__RF39 , UCG-002, F0332 , Phocea , norank_f__norank_o__Elsterales , and Bryobacte was observed in the MCI group. Conversely, the abundance of Actinomyces , Atopobium , Eubacterium_eligens_group , Ruminococcus_gnavus_group , and Streptococcus was significantly decreased in the MCI group ( P < 0.05). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between cognitive scores and intake of yogurt, freshwater fish, crustaceans, and pine nuts ( P < 0.05). Furthermore, the abundance of Actinomyces and Streptococcus correlated positively not only with intake of freshwater fish and yogurt but also with cognitive performance. Conversely, UCG-003 and Desulfovibrio abundance correlated negatively with intake of crustaceans and yogurt and with cognitive scores. Additionally, serum LDL-C levels correlated negatively with yogurt intake and cognitive scores.

Conclusions: In conclusion, intake of yogurt, freshwater fish, and crustaceans was positively associated with cognitive performance. Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota, particularly enrichment of Actinomyces and Streptococcus , may mediate the beneficial cognitive effects of these dietary components. Conversely, UCG-003and Desulfovibrio may exert detrimental effects on cognition. Notably, serum LDL-C levels may represent a mediating factor in the relationship between diet and cognition.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].