Analysis of the Correlation Between Gait Muscle Control Symmetry Index in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and the Risk of Returning to Sports


Abstract

Background. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture is a common and severe sports injury among athletes, directly affecting knee joint stability and threatening their sports careers. Gait, as a high-frequency movement pattern, is closely related to central nervous system control, and lower limb lesions often lead to abnormal gait. This study aims to analyze the correlation between the symmetry of lower limb muscle control in the gait of patients after Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the risk of returning to sports based on the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport assessment, providing scientific guidance for rehabilitation training and helping patients restore their sports ability and reduce the risk of injury when returning to sports.

Methods. The study included 33 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as subjects (athletes at the national second level and above). Six months after unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, they underwent tandem gait and stable gait tests, and data from six complete gait cycles were collected and averaged. The Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test was also conducted. The measured indicators included step length, walking speed, peak amplitude of muscle activation, and the time of peak amplitude of muscle activation. Symmetry indices were calculated, and correlation analyses were performed.

Results. In the stable gait test, the symmetry index of rectus femoris muscle activation peak amplitude was significantly positively correlated with the knee motion return test score (r = 0.420, P = 0.015). The symmetry index of vastus lateralis muscle activation peak amplitude was also significantly positively correlated with the knee motion return test score (r = 0.435, P = 0.011). The remaining test results showed no correlation with the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score (P > 0.05).

Discussion. The symmetry of neuromuscular control of the quadriceps femoris (especially the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis) in patients after Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is closely related to the risk of returning to sports. This finding suggests that the strength and symmetry training of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis should be emphasized in rehabilitation training. Meanwhile, the symmetry of the peak amplitude of activation of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis during stable gait can be used as one of the reference indicators for assessing the risk of returning to sports, providing a scientific basis for rehabilitation training.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].