Effect of temperature acclimation period on upperthermal tolerance in a terrestrial salamander


Abstract

Background. Physiological traits such as the critical thermal maximum (CT max, defined as an individual’s upper thermal tolerance limit) can be important for understanding species' vulnerability to climate and habitat change. A separate trait, thermal acclimation capacity, is defined as the physiological adjustment of organisms to temperature variation, which can affect phenotypic traits such as CTmax. Indeed, the relationship between acclimation capacity and CTmax has been widely studied in ectotherms like fish, amphibians, and reptiles, and it is generally observed that CTmax increases when the acclimation temperature is higher. However, there is a lack of information about whether amphibians respond differently to long- versus short-term acclimation. Understanding thermal acclimation capacity in response to rapid environmental change is important because high acclimation capacity may reduce vulnerability. Here, we evaluated thermal acclimation capacity in the Eastern Red-backed Salamander, Plethodon cinereus, in response to short- and long-term acclimation in a laboratory setting.

Methods. We exposed salamanders to three different treatments: control animals were maintained at 15 °C for 30 days; animals in the short-term acclimation group were maintained at 15 °C for 28 days, and 23 °C for 48 hours before testing CT max ; and animals in the long-term acclimation group were maintained at 23 °C for 30 days. We measured the CT max of all animals at the end of the experiment to determine whether tolerance to high temperatures varied depending on the length of exposure to warm conditions.

Results. Although we observed an increase in CT max from the control treatment to the short-term (+0.84 °C) and long-term (+2 °C) acclimation treatments, there was little difference in CT max between short- and long-term acclimation (0.33 °C), and none of the differences we examined were statistically significant.

Discussion . Several factors may explain the low variation in CT max despite the thermal variation treatments described in our study. CT max could be more phylogenetically conserved, or the temperature changes in our treatments may not have been sufficient to elicit a physiological response. Thus, although our results provide limited evidence that there may be a degree of acclimation capacity (or phenotypic plasticity) in CT max in Plethodon cinereus , different acclimation periods did not affect the degree of plasticity.

Ask to review this manuscript

Notes for potential reviewers

  • Volunteering is not a guarantee that you will be asked to review. There are many reasons: reviewers must be qualified, there should be no conflicts of interest, a minimum of two reviewers have already accepted an invitation, etc.
  • This is NOT OPEN peer review. The review is single-blind, and all recommendations are sent privately to the Academic Editor handling the manuscript. All reviews are published and reviewers can choose to sign their reviews.
  • What happens after volunteering? It may be a few days before you receive an invitation to review with further instructions. You will need to accept the invitation to then become an official referee for the manuscript. If you do not receive an invitation it is for one of many possible reasons as noted above.

  • PeerJ does not judge submissions based on subjective measures such as novelty, impact or degree of advance. Effectively, reviewers are asked to comment on whether or not the submission is scientifically and technically sound and therefore deserves to join the scientific literature. Our Peer Review criteria can be found on the "Editorial Criteria" page - reviewers are specifically asked to comment on 3 broad areas: "Basic Reporting", "Experimental Design" and "Validity of the Findings".
  • Reviewers are expected to comment in a timely, professional, and constructive manner.
  • Until the article is published, reviewers must regard all information relating to the submission as strictly confidential.
  • When submitting a review, reviewers are given the option to "sign" their review (i.e. to associate their name with their comments). Otherwise, all review comments remain anonymous.
  • All reviews of published articles are published. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials.
  • Each time a decision is made by the Academic Editor, each reviewer will receive a copy of the Decision Letter (which will include the comments of all reviewers).

If you have any questions about submitting your review, please email us at [email protected].